Skip to main content

Security report for agile.lv

SIA “Agile & Co” · Technology · Latvia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Agile & Co is a Latvian technology consultancy firm specializing in agile ICT project management, security research, and capital services. The company targets businesses requiring agile and security-focused solutions, positioning itself as a niche provider with ISO 9001 certification indicating quality management. The website is built on WordPress with common plugins and libraries, including Google Analytics and reCAPTCHA for analytics and spam protection. However, the site currently displays a 404 error page, limiting content availability and user experience. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and reCAPTCHA in use, but lacks important security headers and visible privacy policies, which impacts compliance and trust. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, reducing domain trust assessment capabilities. Overall, the site shows basic professionalism but requires improvements in content availability, security policies, and transparency to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching agile.lv

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector, focusing on agile project management and security services. Its business model revolves around consultancy and specialized service delivery to organizations in Latvia and potentially beyond. The presence of ISO 9001 certification suggests a commitment to quality standards. The website supports multilingual content (Latvian and English), indicating an intent to reach broader markets. The use of Google Analytics and reCAPTCHA reflects standard digital marketing and security practices. However, the lack of visible privacy and cookie policies and the 404 error page may hinder customer trust and engagement. No social media presence was detected, which could limit marketing reach. The company appears small-sized with a focused service portfolio and professional contact channels.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA on its contact form, which are positive security measures. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces its defense-in-depth posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of visible privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. The WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, publishing clear privacy policies, and ensuring regular platform and plugin updates.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish clear and accessible privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Resolve the 404 error page issue to ensure the main website content is accessible and user experience is restored.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding a data protection officer contact or security incident response information to demonstrate security readiness and transparency.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA “Agile & Co”
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA “Agile & Co”
Description
Agile & Co is a Latvian company offering services including Agile ICT Project Management, Agile Security Lab, Agile Research, and Agile Capital. They provide consultancy and services primarily in technology and security sectors.
Key services
Agile ICT Project Management, Agile Security Lab, Agile Research, Agile Capital
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA, Handlebars.js, TweenLite, CSSPlugin, Slick Carousel, Owl Carousel, Gravity Forms, WPML (WordPress Multilingual Plugin)
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on contact form
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is currently showing a 404 Page Not Found error page.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the main page or footer.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented including phone, email, physical address, and a contact form with reCAPTCHA.
  4. Site uses WordPress CMS with multiple common plugins and libraries.
  5. Google Analytics and Google reCAPTCHA are implemented for tracking and spam protection.
  6. ISO 9001 certification logo is displayed linking to creditreports.lv, indicating quality management compliance.
  7. No visible security headers or advanced security policies detected.
  8. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit exceeded error.
  9. No social media links found in the HTML content.
  10. Site is multilingual with Latvian as primary language and English version available.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern but common technology stack including jQuery, Handlebars.js, TweenLite, and popular plugins such as Gravity Forms and WPML for multilingual support. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for analytics and marketing tracking. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements and uses lazy loading for images. Performance is moderate with no explicit hosting provider identified. The site lacks advanced accessibility features and SEO optimization is basic, with meta tags present but minimal content due to the 404 error page. Technical debt appears low but the missing main content and lack of security headers represent modernization and security improvement opportunities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with agile.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review agile.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.