Skip to main content

Security report for agfa.com

Agfa-Gevaert Group · Technology · Belgium

Partial score · DNS & email only

50/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Agfa-Gevaert Group is a well-established global technology company specializing in imaging, healthcare IT, industrial specialty products, and green hydrogen solutions. The corporate website provides comprehensive information about its business units, investor relations, sustainability efforts, and contact points. The site is built on WordPress using the Avada theme, demonstrating a modern and professional digital presence with good mobile optimization and accessibility. However, the security posture is weakened by an invalid SSL certificate and lack of proper TLS protocol support, which poses a significant risk to user trust and data security. The company has implemented a detailed cookie consent mechanism and maintains a comprehensive privacy policy, indicating strong privacy compliance. Overall, the website reflects a mature enterprise with a solid business model but requires urgent improvements in its security infrastructure to align with best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

Checks completed
5of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching agfa.com

This scan found 4 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
50
DNS health
50
Network security
100
Average
50

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Agfa-Gevaert operates in multiple sectors including energy (green hydrogen membranes), healthcare (medical imaging IT and radiology solutions), manufacturing, and technology. It targets healthcare providers, industrial clients, and investors. The company maintains a strong market position with diversified services and a global footprint. The website highlights its strategic transformation, sustainability priorities, and investor communications, indicating a transparent and well-managed organization. Partnerships and subsidiaries are clearly linked, supporting a cohesive ecosystem. The business model is primarily B2B with a focus on innovation and sustainability.

Security posture

The website's security posture is currently suboptimal due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, which are critical for secure communications. While some security headers like X-Content-Type-Options and HSTS are present, the lack of modern TLS support and OCSP stapling reduces the effectiveness of these measures. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, which may impact the organization's readiness to handle security incidents. The presence of HttpOnly and Secure flags on cookies is a positive practice. Overall, the site requires immediate remediation of its SSL/TLS configuration to protect user data and maintain trust.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and correctly configure a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and disable outdated protocols.
  3. Implement OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve SSL performance and security.
  4. Publish a dedicated vulnerability disclosure or security contact page to enhance transparency.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with the Avada theme, utilizing jQuery and various JavaScript libraries for enhanced user experience. The site includes responsive design elements and accessibility features, ensuring usability across devices. Performance metrics indicate slow loading times, possibly due to large resource sizes or caching configurations. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The technical stack is modern but requires optimization in SSL/TLS configuration and performance tuning to meet enterprise standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with agfa.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review agfa.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.