Skip to main content

Security report for agenza.ch

Agenza GmbH · Technology · Switzerland

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 3 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Agenza GmbH is a specialized web agency based in Kriens near Luzern, Switzerland, focusing on WordPress websites, UX design, e-commerce solutions, and web platform development. The company serves a diverse clientele including SMEs, organizations, and startups, offering tailored digital solutions that emphasize accessibility, SEO, and user experience. Their market position is solid within the regional technology sector, supported by a portfolio of over 93 clients and positive testimonials. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using modern tools such as the Breakdance builder, WooCommerce for e-commerce, and Yoast SEO for optimization. The site is well-optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Analytics and marketing integrations include Google Tag Manager, Google Ads, and LinkedIn Insight, indicating a moderate level of user tracking and marketing sophistication. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and follows good practices by avoiding exposed sensitive data and using reputable third-party scripts. However, explicit security headers and a formal security policy are absent, representing areas for improvement. Privacy compliance is strong with a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy, though a consent mechanism is not evident. Overall, Agenza GmbH presents a trustworthy and professional online presence with a strong focus on quality and client satisfaction. The website's security posture is good but could benefit from enhanced header policies and incident response transparency. The business is credible, well-branded, and aligned with its WHOIS registration data, supporting a high legitimacy score.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching agenza.ch

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
75
Email security
60
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
53
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Agenza GmbH operates as a small-sized technology service provider specializing in WordPress-based web solutions. Their business model revolves around delivering customized websites, online shops, and web platforms with a strong emphasis on accessibility and SEO. The company targets SMEs, organizations, and startups primarily in Switzerland, leveraging a portfolio of over 93 clients and positive customer testimonials as trust signals. They maintain active social media channels and are members of Swiss Made Software, enhancing their market credibility. The firm’s competitive advantage lies in combining UI/UX expertise with technical development and ongoing support, positioning them as a full-service digital partner in their regional market.

Security posture

The security posture of the Agenza GmbH website is solid, with mandatory HTTPS encryption and no visible exposure of sensitive data. The use of Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight tags is standard for marketing but requires ongoing monitoring for privacy compliance. The absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a minor gap that could be addressed to harden the site against common web attacks. There is no published security policy or incident response contact, which limits transparency in case of security events. Overall, the site demonstrates good security hygiene but would benefit from formalizing security policies and enhancing header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve defense against web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and provide incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  3. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and improve user privacy controls.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
  5. Enhance documentation and visibility of data retention policies related to analytics and user data.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Agenza GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Agenza GmbH
Description
Webagentur in Luzern spezialisiert auf Wordpress Websites, UX, Onlineshops und Webentwicklung.
Key services
WordPress Websites, Online-Shops (WooCommerce), Webplattformen, Barrierefreie Websites, Datenschutz-Abos
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Yoast SEO, Breakdance Builder, Swiper.js, LightGallery, GSAP, Google Tag Manager, Google Ads, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Frameworks
Breakdance, Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
excellent
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight for analytics
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight
Marketing tools
LinkedIn Insight
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible and professionally designed.
  2. Strong focus on WordPress-based web solutions with emphasis on accessibility and SEO.
  3. Clear contact information and multiple communication channels provided.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious content or domains.
  6. Good integration of social media and trust signals.
  7. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected despite cookie policy presence.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform enhanced with the Breakdance page builder, providing a flexible and responsive design. It integrates WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities and Yoast SEO for search engine optimization. The use of advanced JavaScript libraries such as Swiper.js and GSAP enables smooth animations and interactive elements. Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight tags facilitate marketing analytics and retargeting. The site loads efficiently with optimized images and video content, demonstrating good performance practices. Accessibility is prioritized with WCAG-compliant design elements. No technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected, indicating a well-maintained infrastructure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with agenza.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review agenza.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.