Skip to main content

Security report for afterlogic.org

Afterlogic Corp. · Technology · N/a

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 3 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Afterlogic Corp. is a technology company specializing in open-source webmail and personal cloud storage software solutions. Their website showcases key products such as Aurora Files and WebMail Lite variants, targeting developers and businesses seeking customizable webmail and cloud storage tools. The company maintains a niche market position with a focus on open-source offerings and live demos to engage potential users. Technically, the website is built on Joomla! CMS with modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for user tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and professional design, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy compliance is partial with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism or terms of service found. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally maintained with room for improvement in security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  4. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching afterlogic.org

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
53
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Afterlogic operates in the technology sector providing software products primarily for webmail and cloud storage. Their business model revolves around offering open-source software with downloadable packages and live demos, supported by services linked through a partner domain. The company targets developers and businesses needing customizable communication and storage solutions. Market positioning is niche with a focus on open-source community engagement. Revenue streams likely include software licensing and professional services. The company has maintained domain registration since 2007, consistent with its founding in 2002, indicating stable operations. Partnerships include afterlogic.works for services. The website content and branding are consistent, supporting a credible business presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer lock enabled. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No explicit security policy or incident response information is published, which limits transparency and readiness perception. The use of Google Analytics and remarketing scripts indicates moderate user tracking without visible cookie consent mechanisms, posing potential GDPR compliance gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could benefit from enhanced header configurations, privacy compliance improvements, and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security.
  2. Implement and display a cookie policy with user consent mechanisms to enhance privacy compliance.
  3. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen web security.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Review and minimize user tracking scripts or provide opt-out options to align with GDPR and privacy best practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Afterlogic Corp.
Description
Afterlogic Corp. provides open-source webmail and personal cloud storage software solutions.
Key services
Aurora Files (personal cloud storage), WebMail Lite PHP (webmail script), WebMail Lite .NET (webmail front-end)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Joomla!, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Joomla!
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Google Ads Remarketing
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses Joomla! CMS with modern scripts
  2. Open-source software focus with live demos
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on main page
  4. Privacy policy present but no cookie or terms of service pages found
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response info published
  6. Uses Google Analytics and Google Ads remarketing scripts
  7. No security headers detected in HTML content
  8. Domain WHOIS privacy enabled with stable registration
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Joomla! CMS, leveraging jQuery and Google Analytics/Tag Manager for functionality and analytics. The site uses responsive design techniques and loads external fonts from Google Fonts. Hosting details are not explicit but DNS is managed via zoneedit.com name servers. Performance is moderate with deferred JavaScript loading and asynchronous analytics scripts. The site lacks advanced accessibility features but maintains good SEO meta tags including Open Graph for social sharing. Technical debt appears low with modern libraries but security header omissions and lack of cookie consent represent areas for modernization. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but can be improved for security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with afterlogic.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review afterlogic.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.