Skip to main content

Security report for afterlogic.com

AfterLogic Corp. · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AfterLogic Corp. is a well-established technology company specializing in email and telecommunications software components and platforms since 2002. Their product portfolio includes .NET and ActiveX email components, webmail clients for PHP and ASP.NET, groupware solutions, and mail server software. The company serves a broad audience including developers, businesses, and telecom providers, with a strong market position evidenced by a client list featuring major corporations and government entities. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality and clear navigation. Technically, the website is built on Joomla CMS with modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and FlexSlider, supporting both Windows and Linux platforms. The site uses HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, though some security best practices like DNSSEC and security headers are missing. Performance and mobile optimization are moderate to good, with room for improvement in accessibility and SEO. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and has domain transfer protections but lacks DNSSEC and explicit security headers. There is no visible security policy or incident response information, and no vulnerability disclosure mechanism is present. Tracking is done via Google Analytics and Tag Manager with moderate user tracking levels. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be enhanced with additional measures. The overall risk assessment is moderate with no critical issues detected. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, publishing security and incident response policies, and implementing a vulnerability disclosure program to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  4. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching afterlogic.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
50
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
68
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AfterLogic operates in the technology sector focusing on email and communication software components and platforms. Their competitive advantage lies in a comprehensive product suite covering email components for multiple development environments, webmail clients, groupware, and mail server solutions. The business model is primarily software sales and related services, targeting developers, enterprises, and telecom providers. The company demonstrates growth and stability with a long domain history and a prestigious client base. Partnerships include related domains such as afterlogic.org for cloud storage solutions. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear product offerings and client testimonials, supporting a strong market position.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and domain transfer protections are in place, but DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers are detected in the HTML content. There is no published security policy or incident response information, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present. Data protection practices include cookie consent mechanisms, but privacy compliance could be improved with clearer GDPR indicators. The use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager introduces moderate user tracking. Overall, the security culture appears functional but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced technical controls to mitigate risks and improve compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to protect against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a formal security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Review and enhance privacy compliance measures, including GDPR-specific disclosures and data retention policies.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AfterLogic Corp.
Description
AfterLogic offers mail server, ajax webmail with calendar, mail components, development and installation services
Key services
MailBee.NET Objects (.NET email components), MailBee ActiveX Components, WebMail Pro PHP and ASP.NET, Aurora Corporate groupware, MailSuite Pro for Linux mail server, Unified Messaging Solution, Transactional and newsletter email sending solution (Triton)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Joomla CMS, PHP, ASP.NET, AJAX, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, jQuery, FlexSlider
Frameworks
Joomla
Platforms
Windows, Linux
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Google Remarketing
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is professional and relevant to email and communication software
  3. Strong client list with major corporations and government entities
  4. Use of Joomla CMS with modern JavaScript libraries
  5. Cookie consent implemented with clear privacy policy
  6. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers visible on homepage; contact form available
  7. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy
  8. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content
  9. No DNSSEC enabled for domain
  10. Use of Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Joomla CMS with a combination of PHP and ASP.NET platforms supporting their product offerings. It uses modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery and FlexSlider for UI components. Hosting is managed through NameCheap with DNS servers at zoneedit.com. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to modernize security configurations and improve accessibility standards. The infrastructure supports a professional and functional user experience aligned with business goals.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with afterlogic.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review afterlogic.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.