Skip to main content

Security report for afs.cz

AFS · Education · Czech Republic

Partial score · DNS & email only

71/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AFS Česká Republika is a well-established non-profit organization focused on intercultural education and exchange programs. The website presents a professional and comprehensive digital presence, offering detailed information about study abroad programs, hosting foreign students, volunteering, and scholarships. The organization targets students, parents, volunteers, and educational institutions, positioning itself as a key player in intercultural educational services within the Czech Republic and globally through the AFS network. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern SEO and analytics integrations, including Google Analytics, Hotjar, and Facebook Pixel, supported by a CDN for performance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS, reCAPTCHA, and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security headers could be enhanced. WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly impacts trust but is mitigated by the organization's transparency and social proof. Overall, the site is safe, user-friendly, and compliant with GDPR, reflecting a mature digital strategy for a non-profit educational entity.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching afs.cz

This scan found 16 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
Average
71

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention afs.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
3
Employees
0
Customers
1
Third parties
2
Weak passwords
67%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for afs.cz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the education and non-profit sectors, providing intercultural exchange and volunteer programs. Its business model relies on program fees, scholarships, and volunteer engagement. The website's content and structure indicate a strong focus on accessibility and user engagement, with clear calls to action for applications and volunteering. The presence of multiple social media channels and detailed policies suggests a mature marketing and compliance approach. The lack of WHOIS data is a minor concern but likely due to privacy protection. The organization appears well-positioned in its niche with a medium-sized operational scale and a strong brand identity.

Security posture

The website demonstrates good security hygiene with HTTPS, Google reCAPTCHA on forms, and a cookie consent banner supporting GDPR compliance. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, explicit security headers like X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options were not clearly identified and should be verified. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which could be improved to enhance trust and readiness. The integration of multiple tracking and marketing tools is balanced with privacy controls, reflecting a responsible approach to user data.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive HTTP security headers including X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Conduct periodic security audits and penetration testing to proactively identify risks.
  5. Enhance CSP (Content Security Policy) to further protect against cross-site scripting and related attacks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AFS
Description
AFS is a global non-governmental nonprofit volunteer organization offering intercultural education opportunities for all age groups to help people develop skills, knowledge, and attitudes necessary for creative and harmonious living in a multicultural and increasingly interconnected world.
Key services
Study abroad programs, Host family programs, Volunteer programs, Educational programs for schools, Scholarships
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Google reCAPTCHA, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, AddThis, Vimeo embed, YouTube embed, jQuery
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration on forms
  • Cookie consent banner with privacy settings
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Analytics 4, Hotjar
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics 4, Hotjar
Marketing tools
AddThis, Facebook Social Plugins
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  3. WHOIS data unavailable, possibly due to privacy or registry restrictions
  4. Strong privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  5. Multiple social media and external trusted domains linked
  6. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices
  7. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data
  8. Clear contact information with emails, phones, and physical address
  9. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences
  10. Good integration of analytics and marketing tools with privacy controls
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO for optimization, Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection, and integrates analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, and Facebook Pixel. It leverages Amazon Cloudfront CDN for content delivery, improving performance and availability. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. The use of structured data (JSON-LD) enhances SEO and content discoverability. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and security header implementation. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly experience aligned with the organization's mission.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with afs.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review afs.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.