Skip to main content

Security report for afilias.info

Identity Digital Inc. · Technology · United States

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Identity Digital Inc. operates as a leading domain registry and registrar service provider, offering the world's largest and most relevant domain extension portfolio. The company targets a broad audience including businesses, governments, nonprofits, individuals, and registry/registrar partners. Their market position is strong, serving Fortune 50 companies and startups alike, with key services including domain registry, registrar services, reseller partnerships, and domain portfolio management. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and comprehensive content. Technically, the website is built on Webflow CMS and leverages modern web technologies such as GSAP for animations, HubSpot for marketing and analytics, and Google Tag Manager for tracking. The site is well-optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and SEO. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced, cookie consent mechanisms, and no exposed sensitive data. However, explicit security headers and a dedicated security policy are not evident. The WHOIS data is privacy protected by the registry operator, which is consistent with the business type and privacy regulations. No suspicious registration patterns were detected. The site maintains good privacy compliance with GDPR-aligned policies and cookie consent. Contact information is primarily via web forms, with no direct emails or phone numbers publicly listed. Overall, Identity Digital presents a trustworthy and professional online presence with strong business credibility and technical maturity. Security practices are good but could be enhanced with more explicit policies and headers. Privacy compliance is well addressed. The domain registration trustworthiness is high given the registry operator's involvement and privacy protection.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching afilias.info

This scan found 19 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
45
Email security
78
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Identity Digital holds a dominant position in the domain registry and registrar market, leveraging a vast portfolio of domain extensions to serve a diverse customer base. Their business model focuses on enabling partners and customers to create authentic digital identities through descriptive domain names. Revenue streams likely include domain registrations, renewals, reseller partnerships, and technology solutions. The company demonstrates growth through partnerships and a broad sector focus spanning business, education, finance, healthcare, legal, and more. Their marketing ecosystem includes HubSpot and Google Tag Manager, supporting lead generation and analytics. Strategic observations include a strong emphasis on security, privacy, and customer experience, positioning them well against competitors in the domain services industry.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced site-wide, cookie consent with opt-in mechanisms, and use of reCAPTCHA to protect forms. No sensitive data is exposed in the HTML content. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not clearly present and should be implemented to enhance protection against common web attacks. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and readiness perception. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is found, which could improve security culture and community engagement. Overall, the security maturity is good but can be improved with formalized policies and header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and provide clear incident response contact information.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility compliance to meet broader standards and improve user experience.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Identity Digital Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Identity Digital Inc.
Description
Identity Digital empowers businesses, governments, nonprofits, and individuals to share their unique story with descriptive domain names, and enables registry and registrar partners with robust services and technology solutions.
Key services
Domain registry services, Registrar services, Reseller partnerships, Domain portfolio management, Security and technology solutions for domains
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, jQuery, GSAP (GreenSock Animation Platform), Finsweet Cookie Consent
Platforms
Webflow CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
HubSpot Analytics
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong focus on domain registry and registrar services with a large portfolio.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with opt-in consent mechanism.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers publicly listed; contact via form only.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found.
  7. WHOIS data is privacy protected, consistent with registry operator policies.
  8. No signs of WAF or content blocking detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern and scalable infrastructure using Webflow CMS, supported by advanced animation libraries like GSAP and marketing tools such as HubSpot and Google Tag Manager. The hosting is provided by Webflow, ensuring reliable uptime and performance. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Performance is fast with optimized images and asynchronous script loading. Technical debt appears low, with clean HTML and CSS. Opportunities exist to improve security header implementation and formalize security policies. The technology stack supports the business goals effectively with room for continuous modernization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with afilias.info. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review afilias.info.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.