Skip to main content

Security report for adspector.io

Компания Adspector · Technology · Russia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Компания Adspector operates a website primarily focused on client engagement through a New Year greeting and gift delivery form. The company appears to be a small, newly founded Russian advertising service provider, targeting Russian-speaking clients. The website content is minimal and primarily serves as a seasonal interaction point rather than a full corporate site. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript frameworks (Vue.js) and is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS services, indicating a basic but modern infrastructure. However, the site lacks critical security headers, DNSSEC, and visible SSL configuration details, which limits its security posture. Privacy and compliance features are absent, with no privacy or cookie policies, and no GDPR compliance indicators. The site collects personal data via forms without visible privacy safeguards. Overall, the risk level is moderate due to the lack of security and compliance features, but no critical vulnerabilities or malicious indicators were found.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching adspector.io

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business is positioned as a small advertising service provider in Russia, newly established in 2023. Its market presence is limited, with no visible partnerships or certifications. The business model appears to focus on direct client engagement and personalized marketing, as evidenced by the gift delivery form. Revenue streams and competitive advantages are not disclosed. The company uses privacy protection for domain registration, which is typical for startups. The lack of contact details and policies suggests an early-stage or limited online presence. No analytics or marketing tracking tools are employed, indicating a low level of digital marketing sophistication.

Security posture

The website's security posture is basic. The domain is protected with clientTransferProhibited status but lacks DNSSEC. No security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS are detected. The site uses HTTPS (implied by Cloudflare DNS and typical modern hosting), but SSL configuration details are unknown. The form collects sensitive personal data without visible privacy or security notices, which is a compliance risk. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. Overall, the site demonstrates minimal security best practices and lacks transparency on data protection measures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance domain name system security.
  2. Implement standard security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  4. Add clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve trust and compliance.
  5. Conduct a security audit of form input handling and data storage to ensure protection of personal data.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Компания Adspector
Description
Компания Adspector is a business that engages in advertising-related services, as implied by the company name and the context of the website offering a New Year gift and requesting user data for delivery.
Key services
Advertising services, Client engagement and gift delivery
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Vue.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a simple landing page for a New Year greeting and gift delivery form
  2. Content is entirely in Russian
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided
  5. Form collects personal data including surname, name, birth date, phone number, and gift delivery address
  6. No visible security or compliance information
  7. Uses Cloudflare DNS and likely CDN
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected
  9. No social media or external business links present
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Vue.js framework with JavaScript assets loaded asynchronously. Hosting is via Cloudflare DNS and likely CDN services, providing performance and basic DDoS protection. The site lacks SEO meta tags beyond the title and favicon. Accessibility features are minimal, with a noscript message but no ARIA attributes detected. The site is moderately optimized for mobile but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility optimizations. No CMS or third-party analytics tools are detected, indicating a lightweight custom implementation. Performance is moderate with deferred script loading but no explicit performance metrics available.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with adspector.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review adspector.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.