Skip to main content

Security report for adomik.com

Adomik · Technology · France

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Adomik is a technology company specializing in smart advertising analytics, providing a platform that aggregates and harmonizes advertising revenue data from multiple sources such as ad servers, SSPs, and header bidding partners. The platform is designed to help publishers increase their advertising yield and revenue through comprehensive data insights and sales enablement tools. The company is positioned as a trusted partner for major global publishers, evidenced by client logos and testimonials from Microsoft, BBC, Tripadvisor, and others. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and analytics integrations, demonstrating a mature digital presence. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though improvements can be made by implementing security headers and publishing incident response details. The absence of WHOIS data reduces transparency but does not detract from the professional presentation and trust signals on the site. Overall, Adomik presents a credible and professional business with a strong focus on advertising technology and data-driven revenue optimization.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching adomik.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Adomik operates in the advertising technology sector, targeting publishers and advertising teams who require detailed analytics and revenue management solutions. Their SaaS business model focuses on delivering actionable insights through data aggregation, benchmarking, and sales enablement applications. The company leverages partnerships with major publishers and integrates with numerous data sources via a robust connector ecosystem. Growth indicators include a diverse client base and multiple product offerings tailored to revenue management and sales enablement. The company’s digital marketing strategy includes use of HubSpot, LinkedIn, and Google Tag Manager, supporting lead generation and customer engagement. Strategic observations highlight the company’s emphasis on data accuracy, customization, and market benchmarking as competitive advantages.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent mechanisms, indicating compliance with privacy regulations such as GDPR. However, no explicit security headers (e.g., Content Security Policy, HSTS) were detected in the provided data, representing an area for enhancement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified. The site uses secure forms for contact but lacks publicly available incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure policies, which could improve security transparency and readiness. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good, with recommendations to strengthen header policies and incident response visibility. The absence of WHOIS data is a concern for domain registration transparency but does not directly impact website security.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure information, including security contact emails.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate risks from outdated software.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards for broader compliance.
  5. Improve domain registration transparency by ensuring WHOIS data is publicly available or justified if privacy protected.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Adomik
Description
Adomik provides a Smart Advertising Analytics platform used by leading publishers to collect, organize, and analyze advertising revenue data from ad servers, SSPs, and header bidding partners to increase yield and revenue.
Key services
Revenue Management (Report, Data Export), Sales Enablement (Benchmark, Lead Generation, Deal Management), Data Engine (Data collection, harmonization, mapping, customization)
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.5.17, WPBakery Page Builder, jQuery 1.12.4, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag, HubSpot Analytics, Contact Form 7, Carousel Anything plugin, Cookie Notice plugin, Intercom widget
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security commitment page

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, HubSpot Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Intercom
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag, HubSpot Analytics, Intercom
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Intercom
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. Strong branding with major client logos and testimonials.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers publicly listed; contact via form only.
  5. Use of multiple marketing and analytics tools indicating mature digital marketing.
  6. No explicit security headers detected in provided data; opportunity for improvement.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain registration transparency.
  8. No evidence of adult or questionable content; content is business and technology focused.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.5.17 with WPBakery Page Builder and uses a variety of plugins for carousel, contact forms, cookie notices, and analytics integration. The tech stack includes jQuery 1.12.4 and multiple marketing and tracking scripts such as Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag, HubSpot, and Intercom. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO practices including meta tags and structured navigation. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and accessibility. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The site architecture supports a rich content experience with client testimonials, product descriptions, and multiple calls to action. Technical risks include the use of an older jQuery version and missing security headers, which should be addressed to maintain robustness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with adomik.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review adomik.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.