Skip to main content

Security report for adobe.com

Adobe, Inc. · Technology · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Adobe, Inc. is a leading global technology company specializing in creative, marketing, and document management solutions. The website www.adobe.com serves as a primary digital presence showcasing Adobe's product offerings such as Creative Cloud, Photoshop, and Adobe Express. The site targets creators, businesses, and enterprises seeking digital content creation and marketing tools. The business model revolves around software products and cloud services, positioning Adobe as a dominant player in the technology sector. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including JavaScript modules, WebP images, and CDN delivery via Akamai, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. However, some technical aspects such as security headers and explicit privacy disclosures are not evident in the provided HTML snapshot. Security posture appears moderate with HTTPS implied but no visible security headers or explicit security policies. No WHOIS data was available, likely due to privacy protection or registry restrictions, but the domain and content strongly indicate legitimacy. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but could improve transparency on privacy and security policies.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of adobe.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching adobe.com

This scan found 13 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
80
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
76
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Adobe maintains a strong market position as a technology enterprise focused on digital media and marketing solutions. Its competitive advantage lies in a comprehensive suite of creative and document management tools widely adopted globally. The business model is subscription-based SaaS with additional enterprise services. The target customer segments include individual creators, SMBs, and large enterprises. The website reflects a consistent brand image and professional content, supporting Adobe's reputation. The lack of visible contact information or privacy policies in the HTML snapshot suggests these may be located elsewhere or require deeper navigation. Adobe's partnership ecosystem is not explicitly visible here but is known to be extensive. The company operates at an enterprise scale with a global footprint.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and modern web technologies but lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options in the provided HTML. No forms or input fields were detected, reducing immediate attack surface. No explicit privacy or cookie policies were found, which is a compliance gap. The absence of WHOIS data is typical for large enterprises using privacy protection or registry restrictions. No incident response or security contact information is visible. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by adding explicit security headers, privacy disclosures, and incident response contacts to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies prominently on the website.
  2. Add standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear contact information including security incident response and data protection officer contacts.
  4. Conduct a security audit to verify SSL/TLS configuration and remove any vulnerable libraries or scripts.
  5. Enhance transparency by including vulnerability disclosure policies and security certifications on the site.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Adobe, Inc.
Description
Adobe is changing the world through digital experiences. We help our customers create, deliver and optimize content and applications.
Key services
Creative Cloud, Photoshop, Adobe Express, Document management, Marketing and commerce solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Typekit fonts, Akamai CDN, Adobe IMS library, WebP images, CSS stylesheets
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Analytics and tracking

Services
Adobe Marketing Tech
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
akam/13/pixel_7b4a67b5
Marketing tools
Adobe Marketing Tech
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible and professional
  2. No WHOIS data available publicly for domain www.adobe.com
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service links found in provided HTML snapshot
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content
  5. No forms detected in the provided HTML content
  6. Use of modern image formats (WebP), responsive images, and JavaScript modules
  7. Presence of Adobe-specific marketing and tracking scripts
  8. No visible security headers or meta tags indicating security policies
  9. No JSON-LD structured data found in the HTML snapshot
  10. No social media links explicitly found in the provided HTML snapshot
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack with JavaScript modules, Typekit fonts, and Akamai CDN for content delivery. Images are optimized with WebP format and responsive design techniques are employed for mobile optimization. The HTML is valid and includes appropriate meta tags for SEO and social sharing (Open Graph, Twitter cards). However, no CMS or framework is explicitly detected. Performance is moderate with some deferred scripts and preloading hints. Accessibility features are basic but present. There is no visible JSON-LD structured data which could improve SEO. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and structured data integration.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 75/100Medium4 findings · partial scanView report
  2. 75/100Medium22 findings · partial scanView report
  3. 72/100Medium23 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with adobe.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review adobe.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.