Skip to main content

Security report for adobe.com

Adobe · Technology · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Adobe is a leading global technology company specializing in creative, marketing, and document management software solutions. The website content reflects a professional and enterprise-grade digital presence targeting creators and businesses worldwide. The site uses modern web technologies including Adobe Experience Manager CMS and Akamai CDN, ensuring fast performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though explicit security headers and privacy policies are not evident in the provided HTML snippet. The absence of WHOIS data is unusual for a domain of this stature and slightly reduces trustworthiness, but the overall branding and content quality strongly support legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include publishing clear privacy and cookie policies, enhancing security headers, and providing incident response information to improve compliance and trust.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of adobe.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching adobe.com

This scan found 13 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
80
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
76
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Adobe operates in the technology sector with a focus on digital media and marketing solutions. Its business model revolves around software products and cloud services for creative professionals and enterprises. The company maintains a strong market position with a comprehensive product catalog and global reach. The website reflects a mature digital marketing ecosystem with integrated tracking and marketing tools. No direct contact information or detailed business registration data was found in the HTML, but the brand recognition and content quality indicate a large enterprise with extensive resources and partnerships.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses modern web technologies, indicating a good baseline security posture. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No forms or input fields were detected, reducing attack surface on the homepage. No vulnerability disclosure or security policy information was found, which is a gap in transparency. The missing WHOIS data is a concern for domain trust but may be due to query limitations or privacy protection. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced with better header policies and published security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement and enforce security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen site security.
  3. Provide visible security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Investigate and resolve WHOIS data availability issues to improve domain registration transparency.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking technologies to ensure privacy compliance and minimize user tracking.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Adobe
Description
Adobe is changing the world through digital experiences. We help our customers create, deliver and optimize content and applications.
Key services
Creative software products, Marketing solutions, Document management solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML5, Akamai CDN, Typekit fonts
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Use of defer attribute on scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Adobe Marketing Tech
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
akam/13/7b4a66db, akam/13/pixel_7b4a66db
Marketing tools
Adobe Marketing Tech scripts
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. No forms detected on the homepage HTML provided
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML
  4. Strong branding and professional design
  5. No privacy or cookie policy links found in the provided HTML snippet
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  7. No social media links explicitly found in the HTML snippet
  8. Use of Adobe Experience Manager CMS inferred from URL patterns and scripts
  9. Use of Akamai CDN and Adobe marketing technology scripts
  10. No signs of adult or questionable content
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages Adobe Experience Manager CMS and Akamai CDN for content delivery, ensuring high performance and scalability. The use of modern JavaScript modules and deferred script loading optimizes page load times. SEO is supported by canonical links and comprehensive meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter cards. Accessibility is basic but present, with alt attributes and video controls. No broken elements or errors were detected in the provided HTML. The technical infrastructure is robust and suitable for an enterprise-grade digital platform, though improvements in accessibility and security headers would be beneficial.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 75/100Medium4 findings · partial scanView report
  2. 75/100Medium21 findings · partial scanView report
  3. 72/100Medium23 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with adobe.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review adobe.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.