Skip to main content

Security report for adhoc.se

Adhoc Systems AB · Technology · Sweden

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Adhoc Systems AB is a Swedish small-sized company specializing in digitalization services, focusing on IT system changes and workflow improvements for various sectors including healthcare and industrial production. The company operates from Lund, Sweden, and emphasizes confidentiality in its projects. The website content is professionally presented in Swedish, targeting businesses and organizations seeking digital transformation solutions. The company holds a Microsoft Partner certification and displays trust indicators such as association with Barncancerfonden and a Bisnode credit rating logo. Technically, the website uses a Bootstrap 3.2.0 framework with jQuery and Flexslider for UI components. However, it relies on legacy technologies such as the ga.js Google Analytics script and loads resources over unsecured HTTP, which negatively impacts security and performance. The site is mobile responsive but lacks advanced accessibility and SEO optimizations. No CMS or hosting provider information is evident. From a security perspective, the site lacks HTTPS enforcement and security headers, exposing it to potential risks. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating non-compliance with GDPR requirements. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The absence of secure forms and modern tracking practices further reduces the security posture. Overall, the website is functional and professional but requires significant improvements in security, privacy compliance, and technical modernization to enhance trust and protect user data. Strategic recommendations include migrating to HTTPS, implementing privacy and cookie policies, updating analytics tools, and adopting security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching adhoc.se

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention adhoc.se, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for adhoc.se right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Adhoc Systems AB positions itself as a specialized digitalization consultancy serving Swedish businesses and public sector clients. Its competitive advantage lies in long experience and a focus on confidentiality. The business model is service-oriented, delivering tailored IT and workflow transformation projects. The company targets organizations requiring modernization of data handling and IT infrastructure. Trust signals such as Microsoft Partner status and credit rating logos support credibility. The company appears to have a stable regional presence but limited online marketing or social media engagement. Growth potential exists through enhanced digital presence and compliance adherence.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low to moderate. Key vulnerabilities include lack of HTTPS for site resources, absence of security headers, and outdated analytics scripts. No visible sensitive data exposure was detected, but the lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR. Incident response readiness is not documented, and no security contact channels are provided. The security culture appears minimal based on website content. Addressing these gaps is critical to reduce risk and improve user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Migrate entire website and all resources to HTTPS with valid SSL certificates.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR.
  3. Update Google Analytics to use modern tracking scripts with privacy controls.
  4. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS.
  5. Add secure contact forms with CSRF protection and consider publishing incident response contacts.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Adhoc Systems AB
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Adhoc Systems AB
Description
Vi arbetar med digitalisering. Vi har kontor i centrala Lund. Det är lätt att komma hit med tåg eller buss från Malmö, Sturup eller Köpenhamn. Specializes in digitalization projects involving IT systems and workflows with experience in various sectors including healthcare and industrial production.
Key services
Digitalization consulting, IT systems development and integration, Data management solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 3.2.0, jQuery 1.10.2, Google Fonts (Muli), Flexslider, Google Analytics (ga.js)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No forms detected on main page to analyze for secure inputs

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is in Swedish language targeting Swedish market.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. No visible contact phone numbers; only email and physical address provided.
  4. Use of legacy and unsecured HTTP resources reduces security posture.
  5. No forms detected on main page; contact likely via email link.
  6. Presence of trust badges and partner logos adds credibility.
  7. Mobile responsive design using Bootstrap framework.
  8. No structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) found in HTML head.
  9. No social media links detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses an older Bootstrap 3.2.0 framework and jQuery 1.10.2, which are functional but outdated. The use of HTTP for external resources and legacy Google Analytics scripts indicates technical debt. The site is mobile responsive but has only basic accessibility and SEO features. No CMS or hosting details are evident. Performance is moderate but could improve with HTTPS and updated libraries. Modernization opportunities include upgrading to newer frameworks, enforcing HTTPS, and improving SEO and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with adhoc.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review adhoc.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.