Skip to main content

Security report for adacor.com

Adacor Hosting GmbH · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Adacor Hosting GmbH is a German-based technology company specializing in cloud solutions and AI journey consulting. Their services focus on private AI models, private cloud infrastructure, Azure, Kubernetes, and cloud consulting aimed at digital transformation for businesses. The company positions itself as a specialized cloud solutions provider with a medium-sized business footprint. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image targeting business clients seeking advanced cloud and AI services. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern libraries such as jQuery and Font Awesome, and integrates analytics and marketing tools like Hotjar and Google Tag Manager. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly, though some accessibility features could be improved. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable concern for domain legitimacy, requiring further verification. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but could enhance transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching adacor.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
63
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Adacor operates in the competitive cloud and AI consulting market, leveraging expertise in private cloud and Kubernetes technologies. Their business model is B2B, targeting enterprises undergoing digital transformation. The company benefits from a strong online presence with active social media channels and a well-structured website. Revenue streams likely include consulting, managed hosting, and cloud service provisioning. The lack of visible certifications or compliance statements suggests an opportunity to strengthen market trust. The company’s partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed but may include cloud platform providers like Microsoft Azure. Growth indicators include recent content updates and integration of advanced analytics tools. Strategic observations highlight the need for clearer privacy and security policies to align with GDPR and industry best practices.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms in place. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Compliance gaps exist due to missing explicit privacy policies and incident response information. Data protection practices appear basic, with no mention of a Data Protection Officer or vulnerability disclosure program. Incident response readiness cannot be assessed from the available data. The security culture is implied by the use of consent tools but would benefit from more transparent documentation and certifications.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve transparency and GDPR compliance.
  2. Add standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Establish and disclose an incident response and vulnerability disclosure process to build trust and readiness.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure domain legitimacy and reduce suspicion.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide clear contact information including verified company emails.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Adacor Hosting GmbH
Description
Wir sind Ihr erfahrener Partner für private KI-Modelle, Private Cloud, Azure, Kubernetes und Cloud Consulting für die digitale Transformation von Unternehmen.
Key services
private KI-Modelle, Private Cloud, Azure, Kubernetes, Cloud Consulting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Font Awesome 6, Hotjar, Google Tag Manager, Borlabs Cookie, SalesViewer
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Hotjar, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
SalesViewer
Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
Borlabs Cookie
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is professional and focused on cloud and AI services.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the homepage or in metadata.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via Borlabs Cookie.
  5. WHOIS data is missing or domain appears unregistered, which is unusual and warrants further investigation.
  6. Multiple social media profiles linked, indicating active online presence.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  8. No security headers detected in provided data; opportunity for improvement.
  9. No visible forms in the provided HTML snippet; contact likely via phone or other pages.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using modern front-end libraries such as jQuery and Font Awesome 6. It integrates third-party analytics and marketing tools including Hotjar, Google Tag Manager, Borlabs Cookie for consent management, and SalesViewer for lead tracking. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. Technical debt appears low but could be improved by adding security headers and enhancing accessibility compliance. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional business website but has room for security and compliance enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with adacor.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review adacor.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.