Skip to main content

Security report for acure.io

Acure · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Acure is a technology startup founded in 2022, offering an advanced AIOps platform that integrates multiple monitoring and alerting systems into a unified observability and automation solution. The platform targets IT operations, DevOps, and SRE teams managing hybrid and distributed IT environments, aiming to reduce incident resolution times and improve service availability. Acure positions itself as a cost-effective and comprehensive alternative to established monitoring tools, supported by customer testimonials and partnerships with recognized entities such as Microsoft for Startups and New Nordic Ventures. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern SEO and marketing integrations including Yoast SEO, HubSpot, Google Tag Manager, and Calendly. The platform leverages Azure cloud infrastructure and demonstrates moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Structured data and Open Graph tags are properly implemented to enhance search engine visibility and social media sharing. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and domain registration includes standard client protection statuses, but lacks DNSSEC and visible security headers. There is no published security policy or incident response contact, and privacy compliance is limited by the absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies or consent mechanisms. The domain uses privacy protection for WHOIS, which is justified for a startup, and no suspicious patterns were detected. Overall, Acure presents a professional and trustworthy online presence with good business credibility and technical implementation. However, improvements in privacy compliance, security policy transparency, and DNS security would strengthen its security posture and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching acure.io

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Acure operates in the competitive AIOps and IT monitoring market, targeting medium to large enterprises with complex hybrid IT infrastructures. Its competitive advantage lies in integrating diverse monitoring systems into a single platform, reducing alert noise, and automating incident management. Revenue likely derives from SaaS subscriptions with tiered pricing. The company actively builds partnerships and investor relations to expand market reach, particularly in Central and Eastern Europe. The presence of detailed customer success stories and a focus on automation and observability indicate a growth-oriented strategy focused on operational efficiency and customer satisfaction.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security maturity with HTTPS enabled and domain registration protections. However, the lack of DNSSEC, security headers, and published security policies indicates gaps in defense-in-depth and transparency. Absence of incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure policies may hinder rapid response to security events. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms, posing potential regulatory risks under GDPR and similar frameworks. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, but improvements are needed to elevate security maturity and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance and implement a cookie consent banner.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to mitigate common web attacks.
  4. Provide a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to avoid vulnerabilities and ensure secure integrations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Acure
Description
Acure.io is an AIOps solution that integrates all other log and alert monitoring systems, providing observability and automation platform for hybrid IT environments and distributed teams.
Key services
Event Correlation & Noise Reduction, Root Cause & Impact Analysis, Unified CMDB & Automated Discovery, Automated IT Operations, SLA Reporting and Health Analytics
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, Trustmary widget, Calendly
Frameworks
WordPress theme Twenty Twenty-One (customized)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security status flags in domain (clientDeleteProhibited etc.)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, HubSpot
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
HubSpot
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Calendly, Trustmary
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional technology SaaS platform for AIOps and IT monitoring
  2. Content is comprehensive with detailed product features and customer testimonials
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on main page
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers; contact via contact page form
  5. Use of modern marketing and analytics tools (HubSpot, Google Tag Manager)
  6. No security policy or incident response information published
  7. Domain uses privacy protection but is registered with a reputable registrar
  8. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible
  9. Good SEO and structured data usage with JSON-LD and Open Graph tags
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a customized WordPress theme with Yoast SEO for search optimization. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools including HubSpot and Google Tag Manager, and uses Calendly for demo scheduling. The site is hosted via GoDaddy registrar with Azure cloud platform usage indicated. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and basic accessibility features. Structured data in JSON-LD format and Open Graph tags are well implemented for SEO and social sharing. Technical risks include missing DNSSEC and security headers, and reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require ongoing security management.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with acure.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review acure.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.