Skip to main content

Security report for activitytimeline.com

Reliex · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ActivityTimeline, operated by Reliex, is a mature and reputable provider of a Jira plugin focused on resource planning and time tracking. The company has established a strong market presence with over 5,000 teams worldwide, including large enterprises. Their product integrates deeply with Jira, offering capacity planning, timesheets, reporting, and synchronization features that enhance Jira's native capabilities. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and rich in content, including customer testimonials and detailed documentation. Technically, the site leverages modern web technologies and analytics tools, ensuring good performance and user experience. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and uses reCAPTCHA and cookie consent mechanisms, though it lacks explicit security headers and incident response contact details. Overall, the domain registration and WHOIS data confirm the legitimacy and longevity of the business.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching activitytimeline.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets Jira users and project management teams seeking enhanced resource planning and time tracking solutions. Their SaaS business model includes free trials and demos, supported by a strong partnership with Atlassian Marketplace. The presence of certifications like SOC 2 and ISO27001, along with a Platinum Marketplace Partner badge, strengthens their competitive advantage. The company operates in the technology sector with a medium-sized footprint and a consistent brand identity. Their marketing ecosystem includes multiple ad networks and tracking services, balanced with consent mechanisms to comply with privacy regulations. The partnership with Reliex as the parent company provides additional operational support and credibility.

Security posture

ActivityTimeline demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enforcement, use of Google reCAPTCHA, and cookie consent banners. The company holds recognized certifications such as ISO27001 and SOC 2, indicating mature security management practices. However, the absence of visible security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) and lack of published incident response or vulnerability disclosure information represent areas for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the website content. The security score is strong but could be enhanced by adding explicit security policies and contact channels for security incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Create and link to a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve privacy compliance and user trust.
  3. Publish a security.txt file and provide clear incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting and incident management.
  4. Enhance transparency by including direct company contact emails and phone numbers for sales and support inquiries.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and ensure compliance with evolving regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Reliex
Description
ActivityTimeline provides a Jira plugin for resource planning and time tracking, enabling teams to visualize project timelines, manage capacity, track time, and generate reports.
Key services
Capacity planning, Individual time tracking, Team timesheets, Resource utilization reports, Jira integration and synchronization
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA, Hotjar, Bing UET, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Quora Pixel, Segment Analytics, CookieYes Consent Management
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
YouTube (embedded videos)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA
  • Cookie consent banner
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security certifications

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Segment Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Bing UET, Quora Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Bing Ads, Facebook Ads, Quora Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Hotjar, Bing UET, Quora Pixel, Segment Analytics
Marketing tools
Segment Analytics, CookieYes
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Strong integration with Jira ecosystem and Atlassian Marketplace presence.
  3. Multiple customer testimonials and trust badges present.
  4. Good use of modern analytics and marketing tools with consent mechanisms.
  5. Security posture is good but could improve with explicit security headers and incident response info.
  6. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  7. Contact information is mostly via forms and support portal links; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  8. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and long-term operation.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hotjar, and Segment. It integrates embedded YouTube videos and uses cookie consent management via CookieYes. The hosting appears to be Webflow's infrastructure, providing fast loading times and excellent mobile responsiveness. The site structure is clear with well-organized navigation and rich content. There is no indication of technical debt or outdated technologies. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and formalize privacy and security documentation to align with best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with activitytimeline.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review activitytimeline.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.