Skip to main content

Security report for activenetwork.com

ACTIVE Network · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ACTIVE Network operates as a provider of comprehensive race, activity, and event management software solutions targeting organizations such as parks and recreation departments, YMCAs, swim and endurance event organizers, camps, and class providers. The company positions itself as an established player in the SaaS event management market, offering integrated tools to streamline event operations. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional branding and a focus on user engagement through multiple marketing and analytics integrations. Technically, the site leverages modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, Google Fonts, and advanced analytics platforms such as Visual Website Optimizer and Microsoft Clarity, indicating a commitment to performance and user experience. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though explicit security headers and detailed privacy documentation are not evident in the provided data. The absence of WHOIS registration details raises concerns about domain transparency, though the website content and branding suggest legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced compliance documentation and clearer contact information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching activenetwork.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention activenetwork.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
3,950
Employees
0
Customers
3,872
Third parties
78
Weak passwords
31%

17 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for activenetwork.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ACTIVE Network's market positioning as a specialized SaaS provider for event and activity management gives it a competitive advantage in niche markets such as parks and recreation and endurance events. The business model focuses on subscription-based software solutions, targeting institutional clients requiring scalable and integrated event management tools. The presence of multiple analytics and marketing tools suggests a data-driven approach to customer acquisition and retention. However, the lack of visible contact details and privacy policies may impact trust and conversion rates. The company appears to maintain a consistent brand identity and leverages partnerships with major analytics and marketing platforms. Growth indicators are not directly visible but the technical sophistication of the website implies ongoing investment in digital maturity.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement, and integrates cookie consent scripts indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others suggests room for improvement in hardening the site against common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The use of multiple third-party scripts necessitates regular security audits to mitigate supply chain risks. Incident response contact information and explicit security policies are not found, which could hinder effective vulnerability reporting and management. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add explicit security headers to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Provide clear contact information including security incident response channels to facilitate communication and trust.
  4. Regularly audit and monitor third-party scripts and integrations for security vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and compliance to broaden user inclusivity and meet regulatory standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ACTIVE Network
Description
ACTIVE Network offers a variety of all-in-one software solutions for parks and recreation, YMCAs, swim, endurance, camps, classes and more.
Key services
Race management software, Activity and event management, Parks and recreation software, YMCA management solutions, Swim and endurance event software, Camp and class management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Fonts, Webflow CMS, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO), Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Drift Chat, CookieLaw.org Consent Management, JavaScript, CSS3, HTML5
Frameworks
Webflow, VWO A/B Testing and Analytics
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and other analytics with consent management
  • Cookie consent script included

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Microsoft Clarity, Visual Website Optimizer, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Visual Website Optimizer, Drift Chat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected in the provided HTML snapshot.
  3. WHOIS data is missing or not found, which is a concern for domain legitimacy verification.
  4. Multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools are integrated.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML snapshot.
  6. No security headers information available from provided data.
  7. No forms detected in the provided HTML snapshot.
  8. No social media links explicitly found in the HTML snapshot.
  9. Website uses modern web technologies and fonts.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack featuring Webflow CMS, Google Fonts, and multiple analytics and marketing tools such as VWO, Microsoft Clarity, and Facebook Pixel. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices with appropriate meta tags and structured data. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and use of CDNs. However, the lack of detailed hosting provider information and security headers indicates potential technical debt or oversight. The integration of advanced A/B testing and user behavior analytics reflects a mature approach to digital optimization. Opportunities exist to improve technical robustness by enhancing security configurations and expanding accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 62/100Medium25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with activenetwork.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review activenetwork.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.