Skip to main content

Security report for active24.sk

ACTIVE 24, s.r.o. · Technology · Slovakia

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and DNS health.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ACTIVE 24, s.r.o. operates a professional web hosting and domain registration service primarily targeting Slovak and regional customers. The website offers a comprehensive range of services including web hosting, email solutions, server management, website builders, and e-commerce platforms. The company positions itself as a reliable and secure hosting provider with 24/7 customer support and green energy initiatives. The site content is well-structured, professionally designed, and localized in Slovak, catering to both individuals and businesses seeking web presence solutions. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies such as Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, reCAPTCHA, and Iubenda for cookie compliance. The site is mobile optimized and uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration. Performance is moderate with good SEO and basic accessibility features. The hosting appears to be managed by ACTIVE 24 itself or closely affiliated infrastructure. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses reCAPTCHA to protect forms. Cookie consent is implemented via Iubenda. However, explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not publicly available, representing an area for improvement. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious domains were detected, and the WHOIS data confirms the legitimacy and consistency of the domain registration with the business claims. Overall, ACTIVE 24 presents a trustworthy and professional online presence with solid technical and business foundations. Enhancing transparency around security policies and incident response would further strengthen their security posture and customer trust.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of active24.sk. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Weak SPF Policy

      SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

      What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching active24.sk

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ACTIVE 24 is a medium-sized technology company specializing in web hosting and domain registration services. Their business model focuses on providing comprehensive web solutions including hosting, email, servers, website builders, and e-commerce platforms. The company targets both individual users and businesses in Slovakia and neighboring regions. Their competitive advantages include 24/7 customer support, daily data backups, free SSL certificates, and green energy usage. The presence of customer testimonials and a partner ecosystem indicates a mature market position. Revenue streams likely derive from subscription-based hosting plans, domain registrations, and value-added services such as security and managed servers. The company maintains a professional brand image with consistent messaging and a clear focus on reliability and security.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced with good SSL configuration, and forms are protected with Google reCAPTCHA. Cookie consent is managed via a reputable third-party solution (Iubenda), indicating GDPR compliance efforts. However, the absence of publicly available security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits transparency and preparedness perception. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. The use of multiple third-party scripts requires ongoing monitoring to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be improved by publishing explicit security documentation and establishing a formal vulnerability disclosure process.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page detailing security practices and controls.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  4. Enhance HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ACTIVE 24, s.r.o.
Description
Komplexné služby pre váš web. Spoľahlivý a bezpečný hosting, domény, správa serverov, e-maily, redakčné systémy. Nonstop zákaznícka podpora.
Key services
Domain registration, Web hosting, Email hosting, Server management, Website builders, E-commerce solutions, Security services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, reCAPTCHA, Iubenda cookie solution, LiveAgent chat, Slick Carousel, Remodal, Less CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • Daily backups mentioned

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Ads, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Iubenda cookie solution
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Slovak language targeting local and regional customers.
  3. Strong presence of customer support and contact information.
  4. Use of modern tracking and marketing technologies with privacy compliance.
  5. No evidence of security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  6. No suspicious or malicious external domains detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, reCAPTCHA, and Iubenda for cookie management. Styling is managed via Less CSS preprocessor. Interactive elements use Slick Carousel and Remodal libraries. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO meta tags and Open Graph data for social sharing. Hosting appears to be managed internally or by a closely affiliated provider. Performance is moderate with no critical technical debt observed. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The site uses multiple external domains for analytics, support, and social media integration, all reputable and expected for this business type.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 77/100Low27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with active24.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review active24.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.