Skip to main content

Security report for acmeit.org

Acme Information Technology · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Acme Information Technology Pvt. Ltd. (AcmeIT) is a global creative digital agency specializing in WordPress product development and website services. They offer a broad portfolio of WordPress themes and plugins, alongside services such as website design, maintenance, security, e-commerce solutions, and consulting. The company targets startups, designers, agencies, and businesses seeking quality WordPress solutions. Their market position is that of an established WordPress product developer with a global reach and a focus on quality and support. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using modern technologies including PHP, JavaScript, React, and REST API. They utilize frameworks such as Gutentor and CosmosWP for enhanced functionality and design. The site is mobile optimized with good SEO practices and moderate performance. Security measures include HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA integration, though some security headers and policies are not explicitly published. The security posture is solid with encrypted communications and secure forms, but lacks published security policies and incident response information. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected. WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common for this business type, and does not raise immediate concerns given the professional website content. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy digital presence with room for improvement in security transparency and privacy compliance. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security and incident response policies, and implementing cookie consent mechanisms to improve compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching acmeit.org

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AcmeIT operates in the competitive WordPress ecosystem, leveraging a product and service hybrid business model. Their revenue streams likely include theme and plugin sales, premium subscriptions, consulting, and e-commerce development services. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem with multiple related domains representing product lines and service extensions. Their target customers are primarily small to medium businesses, startups, and digital agencies seeking WordPress solutions. The presence of client testimonials and active social media channels indicates a focus on customer satisfaction and brand building. Growth indicators include a diverse product portfolio and active engagement with the WordPress community through multiple branded sites.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA protecting forms. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security or incident response policies indicate gaps in security transparency and formal governance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Compliance with GDPR is partial, with a privacy policy present but no explicit cookie consent mechanism. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not publicly visible, suggesting an opportunity to improve trust and preparedness through published policies and contact channels.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  3. Add a cookie policy and consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and improve user trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency by providing contact information for security incidents and data protection officer if applicable.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Acme Information Technology
Description
Acme Information Technology Pvt. Ltd. known as AcmeIT is a global creative digital agency company. They build WordPress products, design and create beautiful websites focusing on quality code and elegant design with incredible support.
Key services
Website Design and Development, Redesigning or Enhancing Websites, WordPress Expert Services and Products, E-commerce Services, Consulting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, React, jQuery, REST API, HTML, CSS
Frameworks
Gutentor, CosmosWP
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 integration on forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Jetpack Stats
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Jetpack Stats, WordPress.com pixel
Marketing tools
Mailchimp
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is business-focused and professionally presented
  3. Strong presence of WordPress-related products and services
  4. Multiple external partner domains linked
  5. No explicit security policies or incident response info published
  6. No cookie consent mechanism detected
  7. WHOIS data is not publicly available, indicating privacy protection
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress infrastructure using PHP, JavaScript, React, and REST API technologies. It employs popular frameworks such as Gutentor and CosmosWP for layout and design. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The site uses Google Fonts and integrates Google reCAPTCHA v3 for spam protection. Analytics are handled via Jetpack Stats, and marketing includes Mailchimp for newsletter subscriptions. The technical stack is well-maintained but could benefit from improved accessibility features and enhanced security headers. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with acmeit.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review acmeit.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.