Skip to main content

Security report for acmcloud.io

Rural Press Pty Limited · Technology · Australia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website acmcloud.io is an identity management platform focused on providing authentication and sign-in services. The business behind the domain is registered as Rural Press Pty Limited, an Australian company established in 2015. The site currently serves primarily as a sign-in portal with minimal public-facing content or detailed business information. The target audience appears to be businesses or users requiring secure identity management solutions. The market position is not explicitly stated, but the company operates within the technology sector, likely as a niche service provider. Technically, the website uses AngularJS framework, Bootstrap for styling, and is hosted on Amazon AWS infrastructure, as inferred from DNS records. The site includes error monitoring via Sentry (Raven.js). Performance and mobile optimization are basic, with no advanced SEO or accessibility features detected. The site lacks visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, and no contact information is provided on the sign-in page. From a security perspective, HTTPS is implied by the URL, but no security headers are detected in the provided data. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended security enhancement. The use of Sentry indicates some level of error monitoring. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with the business information, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the website is functional but minimalistic, with room for improvement in privacy compliance, security best practices, and user trust signals. Strategic recommendations include adding comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, implementing security headers, improving mobile and accessibility features, and providing clear contact and incident response information to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching acmcloud.io

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
35
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company behind acmcloud.io, Rural Press Pty Limited, operates in the technology sector providing identity management services. The business model likely revolves around offering authentication and access management solutions to other businesses or end-users. The domain age of nearly 9 years supports a stable presence in the market. The lack of public business details or marketing content suggests a focus on B2B or private client services rather than direct consumer marketing. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data. The company appears to maintain a lean digital footprint with minimal external integrations beyond essential hosting and monitoring services.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate. The site uses HTTPS and integrates Sentry for error monitoring, which are positive indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and visible security or privacy policies indicates gaps in security best practices. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could hinder timely handling of security issues. The WHOIS transparency and domain age support legitimacy, but the site would benefit from enhanced security controls and compliance documentation to improve trust and reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and configure HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance statements.
  4. Add clear contact information and incident response channels including security contact emails.
  5. Improve mobile responsiveness and accessibility to enhance user experience and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rural Press Pty Limited
Description
The website appears to provide identity management services, likely focused on authentication and sign-in solutions.
Key services
Identity management, Authentication services
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
AngularJS, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, Raven.js (Sentry)
Frameworks
AngularJS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS implied by URL
  • Use of Sentry for error monitoring

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Sentry
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a sign-in page for identity management services with minimal content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the page.
  3. No contact information or business details visible on the page.
  4. Uses AngularJS framework and AWS hosting infrastructure.
  5. No visible security headers or advanced security policies implemented.
  6. No advertising or marketing tools detected except Sentry error monitoring.
  7. No analytics services explicitly detected.
  8. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with the website's domain and business sector.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using AngularJS, Bootstrap, and Font Awesome, with Google Fonts for typography. It is hosted on AWS infrastructure as indicated by the DNS nameservers. The use of Raven.js (Sentry) for error monitoring is a positive technical practice. The site has basic performance and mobile optimization but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. No CMS or modern frontend frameworks beyond AngularJS are detected, which may indicate some technical debt given AngularJS is an older framework. The site does not expose any forms with fields in the provided HTML snippet, limiting data collection surface. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with acmcloud.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review acmcloud.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.