Skip to main content

Security report for aciah-formations-informatiques-pour-tous.fr

A.C.I.A.H · Education · France

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website represents A.C.I.A.H, a French non-profit association specializing in accessible computer training and human accompaniment services, particularly for visually impaired and disabled individuals. The site offers educational content, training agendas, and workshops, positioning itself as a niche regional player in the accessibility and education sector. The business model is non-profit, supported by various foundations and local organizations, with a clear focus on community service and accessibility. Technically, the site is built on the SPIP CMS platform with jQuery and mediabox for media handling. The hosting is provided by OVH, a reputable provider, and the domain registration is consistent with the business timeline. The website is moderately optimized for performance and accessibility but lacks advanced SEO and mobile optimization features. Security posture is basic, with HTTPS implied but no visible security headers or policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aciah-formations-informatiques-pour-tous.fr

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

A.C.I.A.H operates as a small-sized non-profit entity focused on education and accessibility. Its market positioning is specialized, targeting individuals requiring accessible computer training, including those with visual impairments. The association leverages partnerships with local and regional organizations, enhancing its credibility and reach. Revenue streams likely include grants and public funding, as indicated by references to foundations and European funds. The business model emphasizes community service rather than commercial profit. The website content and linked domains reflect a collaborative ecosystem supporting accessibility and digital inclusion. Growth indicators include ongoing workshops and training sessions with agendas extending into 2025. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to expand digital presence and improve compliance to strengthen trust and funding prospects.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security maturity level. HTTPS is used, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and readiness for security events. Compliance with GDPR is partial, with no visible privacy or cookie policies. The site does not employ tracking or analytics scripts, reducing privacy risks but also limiting user behavior insights. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small non-profit but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, Strict-Transport-Security) to enhance protection.
  3. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents and designate an incident response channel.
  4. Improve mobile responsiveness and SEO metadata to enhance user experience and discoverability.
  5. Consider adding minimal analytics with privacy-respecting configurations to monitor site usage.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
A.C.I.A.H
Description
Association providing computer training, accessibility support, and human accompaniment services primarily for people with disabilities or special needs.
Key services
Computer training, Accessibility workshops, Support for visually impaired users, Collective workshops and agendas
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
SPIP CMS 4.4.6, jQuery, mediabox (lity), CSS reset and custom stylesheets
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
good
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a non-profit association focused on accessible computer training and support.
  2. Content is in French and well-structured with multiple articles and resources.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies are found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via form or contact page link.
  5. No social media links detected in the provided content.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  7. Website uses SPIP CMS and jQuery with mediabox for media display.
  8. Multiple partner and supporting organizations linked, indicating community trust.
  9. No security headers or advanced security policies detected in HTML content.
  10. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms; site is fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on SPIP CMS version 4.4.6, a mature content management system popular in French-speaking communities. It uses jQuery and mediabox (lity) libraries for interactive and media display features. The CSS includes resets and custom stylesheets for layout and typography. Hosting is provided by OVH, a reputable European hosting provider. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization indicators. Mobile optimization is basic but functional. Accessibility is addressed through skip links and accessible navigation, reflecting the site's mission. SEO optimization is basic, with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, indicating a privacy-conscious approach but limiting data-driven improvements. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aciah-formations-informatiques-pour-tous.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aciah-formations-informatiques-pour-tous.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.