Skip to main content

Security report for acedcompact.com

Greater Gainesville Chamber Foundation · Education · United States

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Greater Gainesville Chamber Foundation is a non-profit organization focused on mobilizing community efforts around education to prepare students for higher education and sustainable careers. The foundation collaborates with education, business, philanthropy, workforce development, government, and families to improve systemic education outcomes and align efforts for emerging industry career opportunities. The website is hosted on WordPress.com, using a modern tech stack including Jetpack and Bootstrap, and demonstrates good content quality and professional design. However, the domain is newly registered in 2024, which is inconsistent with the foundation's original founding year of 1992, indicating a recent reactivation or rebranding. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and domain transfer protection, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, representing compliance gaps.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching acedcompact.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The foundation operates as a regional leader in education and workforce development collaboration in the Gainesville area. Its business model is non-profit, funding education and workforce initiatives through community partnerships. The website supports donation processing via PayPal and maintains active social media channels on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. The organization targets students, educators, and community stakeholders, emphasizing collective impact and sustainable coordination. The presence of annual reports and clear mission statements enhances trust and transparency.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS encryption and registrar-level domain transfer protection, indicating a baseline secure environment. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options limits its defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts are provided, which could hinder responsible security reporting. The site uses standard WordPress plugins and themes without detected vulnerable libraries. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with additional controls and policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance statements.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Consider adding explicit contact information including phone and physical address to improve trust.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
Greater Gainesville Chamber Foundation
Registration number
Chamber of Commerce
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Greater Gainesville Chamber Foundation
Description
The Greater Gainesville Chamber Foundation mobilizes the community around education to prepare students for higher education and sustainable careers. It is a collaborative initiative involving education, business, philanthropy, workforce development, government, parents, and families to improve systemic education outcomes and align efforts to prepare students for career opportunities in emerging industries. The foundation financially invests in learners to empower students by funding education and workforce development initiatives.
Key services
Funding education initiatives, Workforce development programs, Community collaboration and leadership, Annual reporting and transparency
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Jetpack, jQuery, Bootstrap, Owl Carousel
Frameworks
WordPress theme Appetite
Platforms
WordPress.com hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Jetpack Stats
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Jetpack Stats
Marketing tools
Jetpack Social Icons
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress.com hosted non-profit foundation site focused on education and workforce development.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information includes email via mailto and social media links but no phone or physical address explicitly listed.
  4. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  5. HTTPS is enabled with no visible security issues.
  6. Content is professional, relevant, and safe for general audiences.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram.
  8. Donation processing via PayPal link.
  9. No advertising networks detected beyond Jetpack tracking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress hosted by Automattic Inc., leveraging Jetpack for analytics and social features, Bootstrap for responsive design, and jQuery for interactivity. The site loads moderately fast with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The domain is newly registered, which may indicate a recent launch or rebranding. No critical technical debt or outdated libraries were detected, but enabling DNSSEC and security headers would strengthen the technical security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with acedcompact.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review acedcompact.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.