Skip to main content

Security report for accessiway.com

AccessiWay · Technology · Italy

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AccessiWay is a specialized technology company focused on providing web accessibility solutions to public administrations, private companies, and non-profit organizations. Their offerings include AI-powered accessibility tools, audits, user testing, PDF remediation, and training via their AccessiWay Academy. The company positions itself as a trusted partner with over 1400 brands served and is part of the team.blue group, indicating a solid market presence. Technically, the website is built on modern platforms like Webflow and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools, demonstrating digital maturity and a commitment to user experience and accessibility. Security posture is good with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security headers and incident response information are lacking. Overall, the website is professional, well-structured, and trustworthy, but the lack of WHOIS transparency slightly reduces domain trust. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security policies, publishing incident response contacts, and verifying domain registration details.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching accessiway.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention accessiway.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
16
Employees
0
Customers
3
Third parties
13
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for accessiway.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AccessiWay operates in the technology sector, targeting organizations needing to comply with digital accessibility laws and improve user experience for people with disabilities. Their business model combines SaaS products with consulting and training services, enabling diversified revenue streams. The company leverages partnerships, notably with team.blue, to strengthen market reach. Their client base includes large enterprises and public sector entities, reflecting a strong market position. The website content and branding are consistent and professional, supporting credibility. Growth indicators include a comprehensive service portfolio and active marketing via webinars, blogs, and events. The company emphasizes compliance with European accessibility regulations, positioning itself as a leader in this niche.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates secure form handling via HubSpot, indicating a baseline secure environment. Tracking and analytics tools are used responsibly with cookie consent mechanisms in place, supporting privacy compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No direct security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file is found, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Create and make publicly available a security policy and incident response plan with clear contact channels for reporting security issues.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security flaws.
  4. Provide direct company contact emails and phone numbers for sales, support, and security inquiries to improve trust and communication.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to minimize risks from vulnerable libraries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AccessiWay
Description
AccessiWay helps public and private companies to improve the accessibility of their website and to be compliant with the law.
Key services
accessWidget (AI-powered accessibility tool), Website Accessibility Audit, User Testing, PDF Solution Suite, Accessibility Services, Training via AccessiWay Academy
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Google Fonts, HubSpot Forms, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, Splide.js carousel, js-cookie
Frameworks
Webflow, HubSpot
Platforms
Webflow hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
excellent
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of HubSpot forms with embedded security
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
HubSpot Ads, Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
HubSpot Marketing
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible and not blocked by any WAF or security challenge
  2. Content is professionally presented with clear focus on web accessibility solutions
  3. Multiple languages supported with hreflang tags and language selection
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact primarily via forms
  6. No explicit privacy or security policy pages found except privacy and cookie policies
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, indicating privacy protection or unregistered domain
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern web technologies such as Google Fonts, HubSpot forms, and JavaScript libraries like Splide.js for carousels. Analytics and user behavior tracking are implemented via Google Analytics, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, and HubSpot Analytics, indicating a mature digital marketing infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features, including keyboard navigation and ARIA attributes. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in loading times due to multiple external scripts. The technical stack is modern and well-integrated, supporting a professional user experience and effective content delivery.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with accessiway.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review accessiway.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.