Skip to main content

Security report for accessibe.com

accessiBe · Technology · United States

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

accessiBe is a technology company specializing in AI-powered web accessibility solutions designed to help businesses comply with ADA, Section 508, AODA, ACA, and WCAG 2.1 standards. The company offers a range of products and services including automated accessibility remediation (accessWidget), accessibility assessments (accessScan), accessible code development (accessFlow), compliance documentation (VPAT), litigation support, user testing, and expert audits. Their market position is strong, serving a global clientele including major brands, supported by 11 registered patents and high customer satisfaction ratings. Technically, accessiBe employs a modern web infrastructure with Cloudflare for DNS and CDN, integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Mixpanel, Visual Website Optimizer, and Usercentrics for consent management. The website is well-optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility, reflecting their core business focus. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, implements key security headers, and uses secure forms. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is robust with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. However, the site could improve by publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contacts. Overall, accessiBe presents a low-risk profile with a professional, secure, and compliant online presence. Strategic recommendations include enhancing transparency on security incident response and vulnerability disclosures to further strengthen trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching accessibe.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
60
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

accessiBe operates in the technology sector, focusing on web accessibility solutions for businesses of all sizes, including small, mid-large, and enterprise clients. Their business model combines SaaS offerings with expert services and litigation support, generating revenue through subscriptions, consulting, and support services. The company targets website owners and partners/agencies aiming to ensure legal compliance and improve accessibility. Their partnership ecosystem includes agencies and strategic platforms, enhancing market reach. Growth indicators include a broad product suite, high-profile clients, and multiple patents, positioning accessiBe as a market leader in AI-driven accessibility solutions.

Security posture

The security maturity of accessiBe's website is high, with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented. The absence of exposed sensitive data and use of secure forms indicate good security hygiene. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms align with GDPR requirements, reflecting compliance readiness. However, the lack of a public vulnerability disclosure program and incident response contact information suggests room for improvement in transparency and incident management. Overall, the security posture supports business continuity and customer trust, with no immediate vulnerabilities detected.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a public vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact channels to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Enhance documentation on data retention policies and privacy practices.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks.
  5. Maintain and update security headers and SSL configurations to current best practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
accessiBe
Description
AI-Powered web accessibility solutions. Make your website compliant with the ADA, Section 508, AODA, ACA, in adherence with WCAG 2.1.
Key services
Automated website accessibility (accessWidget), Accessibility assessment (accessScan), Accessible code development (accessFlow), Compliance documentation (VPAT), Litigation support, User testing, Expert audits
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML5, Google Tag Manager, Usercentrics (consent management), Visual Website Optimizer (VWO), Mixpanel, Zendesk
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
excellent
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data detected
  • Secure forms with proper labels and ARIA attributes

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Mixpanel, Visual Website Optimizer
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Mixpanel, Visual Website Optimizer, Bing Ads
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Usercentrics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible and not blocked by any WAF or security challenge.
  2. Strong focus on AI-powered web accessibility solutions with comprehensive service offerings.
  3. High-quality design and user experience with clear navigation and mobile optimization.
  4. Good privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms in place.
  5. Use of reputable third-party analytics and marketing tools with user consent.
  6. No exposed security vulnerabilities or sensitive data detected in the HTML content.
  7. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and consistency of the business.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript, with integrations of third-party analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Mixpanel, and Visual Website Optimizer. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. The site demonstrates fast loading times, excellent mobile optimization, and strong accessibility features consistent with its business focus. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Technical risks are minimal, but continuous monitoring of third-party dependencies is advised to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 74/100Medium27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with accessibe.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review accessibe.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.