Access-me.software presents itself as a provider of web accessibility tools, targeting primarily web developers and website owners interested in compliance with accessibility standards such as WCAG and ADA. The website content is minimal, with no visible main content on the homepage beyond branding and navigation placeholders. The technical infrastructure relies on common frontend libraries including Bootstrap, jQuery, and Font Awesome, indicating a modern but basic web stack. However, the absence of backend or CMS indicators suggests a simple or early-stage deployment.
From a security perspective, the website lacks visible HTTPS enforcement and security headers, which are critical for protecting user data and ensuring trust. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, which raises compliance concerns especially under GDPR for a UK-based entity. The WHOIS data is limited due to the unsupported TLD and privacy protections, providing no clear domain creation or expiry dates, which impacts trustworthiness assessment.
Overall, the site demonstrates a low maturity level in both content and security posture. The lack of contact information and compliance documentation further reduces business credibility. Strategic improvements in security configuration, privacy compliance, and content enrichment are recommended to enhance trust and user engagement.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
71
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention access-me.software, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for access-me.software right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The business appears to operate in the technology sector, specifically offering web accessibility solutions. The market positioning is unclear due to minimal content and lack of detailed service descriptions. The business model likely involves SaaS or web tool provision, targeting UK-based clients given the geo meta tags. No partnerships, subsidiaries, or parent company information is available. The absence of contact details and certifications limits competitive advantage and trust signals. Growth indicators and revenue streams cannot be assessed from the current data.
Security posture
The security maturity of the website is low. Key vulnerabilities include the absence of HTTPS, lack of security headers, and no visible privacy or cookie policies. There is no evidence of incident response mechanisms or vulnerability disclosure programs. The WHOIS data is privacy-protected, which is common but reduces transparency. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, which limits exposure but also reduces insight into user behavior. The site should prioritize implementing HTTPS, security headers, and compliance documentation to improve its security posture and regulatory adherence.
Recommendations
Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all communications.
Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
Provide clear contact information including email and phone to improve business credibility and support.
Establish an incident response plan and publish vulnerability disclosure guidelines to enhance security transparency.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Access-me
Description
Ultimate Web Accesibility Tool.
Key services
Web accessibility tools
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate
Technology
Stack
Bootstrap 4.4.0, Bootstrap Social 5.1.1, Font Awesome 4.2.0, jQuery 3.4.1, Popper.js 1.14.7, WOW.js 1.1.2
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic
Security
Observed score
30/100
Analytics and tracking
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor
Advertising
Transparency
poor
Site quality
Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low
Key observations
Website content is minimal with no visible main content in the body.
No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
No contact information or forms present on the homepage.
Uses common frontend libraries and frameworks but no backend or CMS detected.
No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
No security headers or HTTPS information available from provided data.
WHOIS data is incomplete due to TLD limitations and privacy protections.
Website targets UK region based on meta tags but no explicit company location or contact.
Logo image present in header with path /bundles/framework/images/web/default/logo_hor.png.
Technical notes
Notes
The website uses a modern frontend technology stack with Bootstrap 4.4.0, jQuery 3.4.1, Font Awesome 4.2.0, and WOW.js for animations. The site is mobile responsive and uses standard meta tags for SEO, though content is minimal. No CMS or backend technologies are detected. Performance is moderate given the use of CDN-hosted libraries. There is no evidence of analytics or tracking tools. The lack of HTTPS and security headers represents a technical risk. The site would benefit from modernization including HTTPS enforcement, enhanced accessibility features, and richer content to improve user engagement and SEO.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with access-me.software. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review access-me.software.