Skip to main content

Security report for acbcoop.com

ACB Co-op · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ACB Co-op is a business-to-business service provider specializing in turnkey channel marketing solutions. Their offerings include rebate and loyalty programs, incentive and reward programs, co-op advertising/MDF, brand compliance, and channel marketing technology. The company positions itself as an expert in optimizing channel marketing strategies for businesses. The website is professionally designed using modern technologies such as Gatsby and React, with integration of major analytics and marketing tracking tools including Google Analytics, Bing Ads, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and ZoomInfo Pixel. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, despite the active and professional online presence. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are found, and no direct contact information is provided on the site, which impacts trust and compliance. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities, but security headers and incident response information are lacking.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching acbcoop.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
95
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ACB Co-op operates in the technology sector, focusing on channel marketing solutions for businesses. Their business model is service-oriented, targeting companies that require program optimization and channel marketing management. The company leverages a modern digital presence to attract clients, emphasizing expertise and innovation in automotive and other industries served. The use of advanced marketing and analytics tools indicates a data-driven approach to customer engagement and program management. The lack of publicly available WHOIS data and contact details suggests a need for improved transparency. The company appears to be medium-sized based on website sophistication and service scope, but no founding year or parent company information is available. The website content and branding are consistent and professional, supporting a moderate market position.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data in the HTML. The use of reputable analytics and marketing scripts is standard but increases tracking footprint. The absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could be exploited. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present, and no incident response contacts are disclosed, limiting transparency and readiness. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing policies and consent mechanisms, which could expose the company to regulatory risks. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers, policies, and disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS registration data to ensure domain legitimacy and improve business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ACB Co-op
Description
Optimize your channel marketing strategy with ACB. We manage rebate programs, SPIFFs, Co-op advertising, and brand compliance solutions. Request a demo today.
Key services
Rebate and Loyalty Programs, Incentive and Reward Programs, Co-op Advertising/MDF, Brand Compliance, Channel Marketing Technology
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Gatsby, React, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Bing Ads, LinkedIn Insight Tag, ZoomInfo Pixel
Frameworks
React, Gatsby
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Bing Ads, LinkedIn Insight Tag, ZoomInfo Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Bing Ads, LinkedIn Insight Tag, ZoomInfo Pixel
Marketing tools
LinkedIn Insight Tag, ZoomInfo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the HTML content.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly presented in the visible content.
  4. Website uses modern web technologies and tracking scripts from major providers.
  5. WHOIS data is missing or domain appears unregistered, which is unusual for an active business website.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies disclosed.
  8. Website content is focused on channel marketing solutions with a professional presentation.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React-based framework (Gatsby) that supports fast rendering and good SEO. It integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools, which provide extensive user tracking capabilities. The site is mobile responsive and uses optimized images with modern formats (AVIF, WebP). No CMS other than Gatsby is detected, and hosting provider details are not explicit. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in accessibility features. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security headers and privacy compliance features to reduce risk and improve user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with acbcoop.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review acbcoop.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.