Skip to main content

Security report for acando.se

CGI Inc. · Technology · Sweden

Low risk. No critical or high findings.

Security score

93/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CGI Inc. is a global leader in IT and business consulting services, established in 1976, with a strong presence in Sweden and worldwide. The company offers a broad portfolio of services including business consulting, system integration, managed IT services, cybersecurity, cloud solutions, and sustainability initiatives. Their market position is solid, supported by recognition such as TIME Magazine's 2024 best companies list. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, comprehensive content, and strong branding consistency. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 9, leveraging modern technologies such as Google Tag Manager, New Relic for performance monitoring, and Akamai CDN for hosting and delivery. The site is optimized for mobile devices, has good SEO and accessibility features, and employs a robust cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, implements security headers, and uses consent management tools. However, explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not published, which could be improved. The WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable, which slightly reduces trust but does not detract significantly given the strong corporate branding and content. Overall, CGI's website demonstrates a high level of professionalism, technical maturity, and compliance with privacy regulations, making it a trustworthy and authoritative source for their services.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Medium

      No MTA-STS Policy

      MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

      What to do: Implement MTA-STS to prevent downgrade attacks

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Medium

      DNSSEC Not Enabled

      DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

      What to do: Enable DNSSEC to prevent DNS spoofing attacks

      • CAPEC-142
      • RFC 4033
      • RFC 4035

Keep watching acando.se

This scan found 8 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
90
Email security
87
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
93

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention acando.se, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2
Employees
0
Customers
2
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for acando.se.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CGI operates as an enterprise-level IT and business consulting firm serving diverse sectors including banking, defense, insurance, retail, healthcare, manufacturing, telecommunications, government, transportation, and energy. Their business model focuses on delivering scalable and sustainable IT solutions globally with local execution. The company leverages deep industry knowledge and a broad service portfolio to maintain competitive advantage. The website's content and structure indicate a focus on enterprise clients seeking comprehensive digital transformation and managed services. Partnerships and social media presence support their market reach and brand awareness. The absence of WHOIS transparency is a minor concern but does not overshadow their established market position.

Security posture

The website exhibits a strong security posture with enforced HTTPS, modern security headers, and cookie consent aligned with GDPR. Use of Akamai CDN and New Relic monitoring enhances security and performance. However, the lack of a publicly available security policy, incident response procedures, or vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency. No direct security contact emails or phone numbers were found. The WHOIS data absence is unusual but may be due to privacy protection or query limitations. Overall, the site follows best practices but could improve in security communication and incident readiness disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page detailing security practices and compliance frameworks.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance WHOIS transparency or provide domain registration details to improve trust.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CGI Inc.
Description
CGI är ett av världens största konsultföretag inom IT- och affärsverksamhet, grundat 1976. De erbjuder kompletta, skalbara och hållbara IT- och affärstjänster globalt och levererar lokalt inom 21 branscher från över 400 platser världen över.
Key services
Business consulting, Systemintegration, Managed IT Services, Application Management & Development, Business process services, Infrastructure services, Cloud & hybrid IT, Cybersecurity, Analytics & Automation, Sustainability & ESG
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 9 CMS, Google Tag Manager, New Relic monitoring, Akamai service worker, TrustArc consent management
Frameworks
Drupal
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content Security Policy present
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, New Relic
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
New Relic, TrustArc
Marketing tools
TrustArc
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Swedish.
  2. Strong corporate branding and consistent messaging.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. No direct emails or phone numbers found; contact via web form.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and performance monitoring.
  6. No visible security policy or incident response contact info.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain registration trust verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by Drupal 9 CMS, indicating a modern and flexible content management system. It uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tag management, New Relic for performance and error monitoring, and Akamai as a CDN and service worker provider for optimized delivery and caching. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. Performance appears fast with lazy loading of images and asynchronous script loading. The technical stack is well-chosen for enterprise needs, though continuous monitoring of third-party dependencies is recommended to mitigate risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with acando.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review acando.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.