Skip to main content

Security report for abill.io

Abillio · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 3 other checks.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Abillio is a Latvian-based technology company founded in 2020, offering a SaaS platform tailored for freelancers to manage invoicing, accounting, payments, and compliance reporting such as DAC7. The platform integrates API capabilities and targets online platforms and freelancers seeking streamlined financial operations. The website demonstrates a good level of digital maturity, leveraging WordPress CMS with modern marketing and analytics tools including Google Analytics, Hotjar, Intercom, and Facebook Pixel. The presence of a cookie consent mechanism indicates awareness of privacy regulations, although no explicit privacy policy or terms of service were detected in the provided content. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement and domain transfer protection, but could be enhanced by enabling DNSSEC and publishing explicit security policies. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy, with consistent branding and clear business focus.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, Google Ads

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching abill.io

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
54
Security headers
65
Email security
55
DNS health
50
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Abillio operates in the technology sector, focusing on financial SaaS solutions for freelancers. Its competitive advantage lies in compliance features like DAC7 reporting and API integration, positioning it as a niche player in the freelancing ecosystem. The company maintains an active social media presence and uses multiple marketing and analytics platforms to engage and understand its user base. The business model is subscription or usage-based SaaS, targeting small to medium-sized freelancers and online platforms. The domain age and registrant data align with the company's founding date, supporting credibility. No subsidiaries or parent companies beyond Abillio SIA were identified.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and uses clientTransferProhibited status to protect domain ownership. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed categories, including necessary, functional, analytics, and advertising cookies. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no explicit security headers like CSP or X-Frame-Options were detected in the HTML. There is no visible security policy or incident response contact information, which are recommended for improved transparency and readiness. The use of Google reCAPTCHA and other anti-bot measures is a positive security practice. Overall, the security posture is good but can be improved with additional DNS and header configurations and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the homepage.
  3. Add explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Create and publish a security policy and incident response contact information, including abuse and security email addresses.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and improve compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Abillio
Description
Platforma rēķiniem, grāmatvedībai un maksājumiem frīlanceriem. DAC7 atskaites un API integrācija tiešsaistes platformām.
Key services
Invoicing, Accounting, Payments, DAC7 reporting, API integration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.6.1, Gravity Forms, Yoast SEO Premium, Cloudflare DNS, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hotjar, Intercom, Facebook Pixel, Active Campaign, CookieYes
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent with detailed categories
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Google Tag Manager, Active Campaign
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Active Campaign
Marketing tools
Intercom, Active Campaign, CookieYes
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional SaaS platform targeting freelancers for invoicing and payments.
  2. Uses modern marketing and analytics tools with cookie consent mechanism.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the homepage or metadata.
  4. WHOIS data is consistent and transparent with no privacy protection.
  5. Security posture is good but can be improved with DNSSEC and explicit security headers.
  6. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML content.
  7. Social media presence is confirmed via JSON-LD structured data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.6.1 with Gravity Forms for form handling and Yoast SEO Premium for search engine optimization. It uses Cloudflare for DNS and likely CDN services, enhancing performance and security. Marketing and analytics integrations include Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel, Intercom, and Active Campaign. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and basic accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts to improve speed. The technical stack is modern and well-integrated but could benefit from enhanced security headers and DNSSEC implementation to reduce risk exposure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 63/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with abill.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review abill.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.