Skip to main content

Security report for abcsoftware.lv

ABC software · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ABC software is a Latvian software development company specializing in integrated IT solutions primarily for law enforcement agencies and e-government systems. Their offerings include electronic document processing, IT system integration, and security solutions tailored for public sector clients. The company maintains partnerships with notable technology providers such as Oracle, Microsoft, and Sitecore, and collaborates on government projects, indicating a strong market position within Latvia's public IT sector. Technically, the website is built on ASP.NET Web Forms with a C# backend and uses jQuery for client-side scripting. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices but lacks advanced accessibility features. Security posture is moderate; while HTTPS is presumably enabled, no security headers were detected, and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the website presents a professional image with clear contact information and partner affiliations but would benefit from enhanced security practices and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching abcsoftware.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets government and law enforcement sectors in Latvia, providing specialized IT solutions that integrate e-government services and digital identity management. Their business model focuses on software development and IT consulting, with revenue likely derived from government contracts and specialized service agreements. The presence of partnerships with major technology firms and participation in national projects suggests a stable and reputable market position. The company emphasizes competence, specialization, and experience as core principles, which aligns with their focus on complex public sector IT solutions. Growth indicators include ongoing scientific research collaborations and active participation in industry clusters. However, the lack of publicly available compliance and security policies may impact trust with new clients.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with presumed HTTPS usage but lacks critical security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates limited transparency and preparedness for security incidents. Compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations is not clearly demonstrated due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The site uses standard web technologies without known vulnerable libraries, but security best practices could be improved significantly. Overall, the security maturity level is moderate but requires enhancements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Establish and disclose an incident response policy and contact channels for security issues to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Improve mobile optimization and accessibility features to enhance user experience and compliance with accessibility standards.
  5. Obtain and publish WHOIS domain registration details or use a registrar that provides transparent domain ownership information to strengthen legitimacy.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ABC software
Description
ABC software ir programmatūras izstrādes uzņēmums. Uzņēmums specializējas integrētu risinājumu izstrādē tiesību aizsardzības iestādēm un e-pārvaldes sistēmu integrācijas risinājumos, nodrošinot elektronisko pakalpojumu izstrādi, IT sistēmu integrāciju un drošības risinājumus.
Key services
Integrētu risinājumu izstrāde tiesību aizsardzības iestādēm, E-pārvaldes sistēmu integrācija, Elektronisko dokumentu apstrāde, IT sistēmu drošības risinājumi, Datu integrācijas un konsultācijas, Programmēšanas pakalpojumi
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
C#, JavaScript, jQuery 3.6.1
Frameworks
ASP.NET Web Forms
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of HTTPS assumed but not confirmed from data

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, and physical address.
  4. Website uses ASP.NET Web Forms technology with jQuery and C# backend.
  5. Partner logos and external links indicate collaboration with reputable organizations.
  6. No social media links or analytics scripts detected.
  7. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts found.
  8. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; limits domain trust assessment.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using ASP.NET Web Forms technology with a C# backend and jQuery 3.6.1 on the frontend. The HTML structure is valid and includes meta tags for description and keywords, but lacks Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data. The site uses custom CSS and JavaScript files and includes a slideshow feature for highlighting key solutions. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of optimization or CDN usage. Mobile optimization is basic, with some responsive design elements but no advanced adaptive features. Accessibility is minimal, with no ARIA roles or landmarks detected. SEO is basic, relying on meta tags but lacking rich snippets or social media integration. Hosting provider and SSL certificate details are not available from the provided data. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but could benefit from modernization and enhanced optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with abcsoftware.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review abcsoftware.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.