Skip to main content

Security report for abc.xyz

Alphabet Investor Relations · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Alphabet Inc. is a large enterprise technology holding company created in 2014 to manage Google and its diverse subsidiaries. The company focuses on innovation, independent management of its businesses, and long-term growth. The website serves primarily as an investor relations portal, providing corporate information and links to official policies. The technical infrastructure is modern, leveraging Google hosting, JavaScript frameworks, and a CMS platform (Brightspot). The site is well-optimized for performance, mobile, and accessibility. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though DNSSEC is not enabled and explicit security policies are not published. Overall, the domain registration and website content are consistent and trustworthy, reflecting a legitimate and established enterprise.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching abc.xyz

This scan found 18 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
45
Email security
100
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention abc.xyz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
13,814
Employees
1
Customers
59
Third parties
13,754
Weak passwords
1%

Latest record dated 2025-08-24 · 3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for abc.xyz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –abc.xyz2025-08-24

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Alphabet holds a dominant position in the technology sector, managing Google and other innovative subsidiaries such as Life Sciences and Calico. Its business model emphasizes strong leadership for each subsidiary and rigorous capital allocation. The website targets investors and stakeholders, providing transparency and corporate messaging. The presence of official Google policy links and references to investment arms indicates a mature business ecosystem. The company benefits from a strong brand, global reach, and diversified technology portfolio, positioning it well for sustained growth.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent, and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of DNSSEC and explicit published security or incident response policies suggests room for improvement. No security headers were explicitly detected in the provided data, and no contact channels for security incidents were found. The site uses Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics, indicating moderate user tracking with compliance to privacy standards. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced with additional transparency and DNS security.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency.
  3. Implement and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Consider adding explicit Data Protection Officer contact details to support GDPR compliance.
  5. Maintain and regularly update cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies to align with evolving regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Alphabet Investor Relations
Description
Alphabet is a holding company created to manage Google and its various subsidiaries, focusing on innovation and independent management of diverse businesses including Google, Life Sciences, Calico, X lab, Ventures, and Capital.
Key services
Internet products and services, Health technology, Longevity research, Investment arms, Incubation of new technologies
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Web Components, Google Tag Manager, CSS Variables, Google Fonts
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URLs and Google hosting)
  • Cookie consent banner present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and targeted at investors.
  3. Strong alignment between domain registration data and website content.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and Google hosting infrastructure.
  5. Privacy and terms policies link to official Google policy pages.
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published on the site.
  8. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and visible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern tech stack including JavaScript, CSS variables, and web components, hosted on Google infrastructure with Google-managed DNS. It uses Brightspot CMS, Google Fonts, and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. Performance is fast with efficient resource loading. No CMS or platform vulnerabilities were detected. The technical implementation supports a professional and scalable digital presence suitable for a large enterprise.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 70/100Medium24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with abc.xyz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review abc.xyz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.