Skip to main content

Security report for aaprojekts.lv

AA Projekts · Technology · Latvia

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AA Projekts is a technology consulting and implementation company specializing in digital transformation, agile scaling, and enterprise tool integration. They provide expert services around SAFe platform implementation, Jama Software, Planview Suite, Tableau, and custom software development, targeting enterprises and public institutions. The company positions itself as a trusted partner with official SAFe Bronze Partner status and ISO 9001 certification, emphasizing quality and compliance. The website is built on WordPress with modern technologies including Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, and Google reCAPTCHA, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. The site is well-optimized for SEO and mobile devices, with clear navigation and professional design. Security measures such as HTTPS, cookie consent, and reCAPTCHA are implemented, though security headers could be improved. Overall, the security posture is strong with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is well addressed with detailed policies and user consent mechanisms. The lack of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification but the website content and certifications support legitimacy. The risk assessment is low, with recommendations focusing on enhancing security headers, publishing a security policy, and improving accessibility. The company demonstrates a solid foundation for digital transformation services with a professional online presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
55/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aaprojekts.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
55
Average
51
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention aaprojekts.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for aaprojekts.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AA Projekts operates in the technology sector with a focus on agile scaling and digital transformation solutions. Their competitive advantage lies in official partnerships with SAFe and long-term collaborations with tool providers like Jama Software and Planview. The business model centers on consulting, implementation, and licensing services for enterprise-grade tools, targeting medium to large organizations and government entities. Revenue streams likely include service contracts, software licensing, and custom development projects. The company shows growth potential through strategic partnerships and a comprehensive service portfolio. Their market presence is supported by certifications and transparent contact information, enhancing credibility and client trust.

Security posture

The security maturity level of AA Projekts is good, with HTTPS enforced, use of Google reCAPTCHA, and cookie consent mechanisms ensuring baseline protection and privacy compliance. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the website content. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. There is no public incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness. GDPR compliance is indicated by detailed privacy policies and cookie management. Overall, the security culture appears professional but could benefit from formalized policies and published security practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices, incident response procedures, and contact information for reporting vulnerabilities.
  3. Create and host a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve trust with security researchers.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Maintain regular security audits and update third-party libraries to mitigate risks from vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
AA Projekts
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AA Projekts
Description
AA Projekts helps simplify processes and enhance efficiency with the latest technology, focusing on digital transformation and business agility.
Key services
SAFe platform implementation, Jama, Planview, Tableau tool implementation, Custom software development, IT security and GDPR audits
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Google reCAPTCHA v2, Avia Framework (Enfold theme), Google Fonts
Frameworks
SAFe (Scaled Agile Framework)
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. Strong focus on digital transformation and agile scaling solutions.
  3. Comprehensive cookie and privacy policies with user consent mechanisms.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with multiple channels.
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 using the Enfold theme and Avia Framework, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 3.7.1. SEO is enhanced with Yoast SEO plugin, and analytics are implemented via Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager. The site uses Google Fonts and integrates Google reCAPTCHA v2 for form security. Performance is moderate with some optimizations like lazy loading images and inline critical CSS. Mobile optimization is good, and the site structure is clear and well-organized. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Technical risks are minimal but could be reduced further by improving security headers and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aaprojekts.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aaprojekts.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.