826michigan · Education · United States
Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.
826michigan is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing free after-school writing programs to students in Southeast Michigan. Their mission focuses on improving literacy and writing skills through various programs including after-school labs, summer programs, and volunteer opportunities. The organization also operates Robot Supply Co., a brick-and-mortar and online shop supporting their educational initiatives. The website positions 826michigan as a trusted regional educational non-profit with a clear focus on youth empowerment through writing. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and leverages modern web technologies such as Gravity Forms for data collection, Google Analytics for user tracking, and Font Awesome for iconography. The site demonstrates good SEO practices, mobile optimization, and basic accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in hosting and speed optimizations. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, uses standard security headers, and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, it lacks a publicly available security policy, incident response information, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Privacy compliance is addressed with a privacy policy and cookie consent, indicating awareness of GDPR requirements. The WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which is common for non-profits. Overall, 826michigan presents a professional, trustworthy online presence with a solid security posture and compliance awareness. Strategic recommendations include publishing a security policy, adding vulnerability disclosure information, enhancing accessibility, and continuous monitoring of third-party scripts to maintain security and trust.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Cloudflare, Google APIs
What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention 826michigan.org, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for 826michigan.org right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with 826michigan.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 826michigan.org.