Skip to main content

Security report for 72skola.lv

Rīgas 72. vidusskola · Education · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rīgas 72. vidusskola is a Latvian secondary school providing educational services to students in Riga. The website serves as an information portal for students, parents, and educators, offering details about school management, admission rules, schedules, and extracurricular activities. The site is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Elementor, WooCommerce, and LMS plugins, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The presence of GDPR-compliant privacy and cookie policies reflects adherence to European data protection standards. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms, though security headers and incident response information are lacking. Overall, the website is professional, user-friendly, and trustworthy, but WHOIS data unavailability limits full domain legitimacy verification.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 72skola.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention 72skola.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for 72skola.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The school operates as a public educational institution targeting local students and their families. Its business model focuses on providing comprehensive secondary education and related support services. The website's content and structure indicate a well-established presence in the Riga education sector. The use of multiple WordPress plugins for LMS and content management suggests investment in digital learning tools. No commercial or advertising activities were detected, emphasizing the institution's educational focus. The absence of WHOIS data restricts insights into domain ownership and registration history, which could be important for verifying long-term operational stability.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communications. Cookie consent is implemented with customization options, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS reduces defense-in-depth. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policies were found, limiting transparency for security researchers. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site uses reputable plugins but should maintain regular updates to mitigate risks. Incident response contact information is absent, which could delay handling of security incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve security transparency and incident handling.
  3. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to prevent exploitation of known vulnerabilities.
  4. Add incident response contact information on the website to facilitate timely reporting and resolution of security issues.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to comply with international standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rīgas 72. vidusskola
Description
Rīgas 72. vidusskola is a secondary school located in Riga, Latvia, providing education services including general education, extracurricular activities, and support services for students and parents.
Key services
General education, Extracurricular programs, Student support services, Parental engagement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Elementor, WPBakery Page Builder, Slider Revolution, LayerSlider, jQuery, Google Fonts
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner with customization
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a Latvian secondary school site with comprehensive educational content.
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with multiple popular plugins for LMS, forms, and sliders.
  3. Has GDPR-compliant cookie consent and privacy policy in Latvian language.
  4. Contact information includes phone number and physical address in Riga.
  5. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; limits domain trust verification.
  6. No visible security headers detected; SSL is properly configured.
  7. No evidence of advertising networks or affiliate marketing.
  8. No security.txt or incident response info found.
  9. Content is safe and appropriate for general audiences.
  10. Good mobile optimization and navigation clarity.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress CMS with a combination of popular plugins including WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities, Elementor and WPBakery for page building, and LayerSlider and Slider Revolution for rich media content. The tech stack is modern and widely supported, facilitating ease of maintenance and extensibility. Performance is moderate with some optimization potential, especially in loading times and mobile responsiveness. The site uses Google Fonts and jQuery libraries, common in WordPress environments. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 72skola.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 72skola.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.