Skip to main content

Security report for 711proxy.com

711Proxy · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

711Proxy is a technology company specializing in providing global residential IP proxy services, including rotating and static proxies across 200 countries. The company targets enterprise clients requiring high-quality, stable, and private proxy solutions. Their website presents a professional and modern design, leveraging multiple analytics and marketing tools to optimize user engagement and advertising reach. However, the lack of publicly available WHOIS registration data and absence of explicit privacy and terms of service policies indicate gaps in transparency and compliance. The technical infrastructure includes modern front-end technologies and integration with various third-party tracking and payment SDKs, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks visible security headers and formal security policies. Overall, the business appears legitimate but would benefit from enhanced transparency and compliance documentation to improve trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 711proxy.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

711Proxy operates in the proxy service market, offering a large pool of residential IP addresses to enterprises globally. Their business model is subscription-based proxy services, focusing on high utilization and privacy. The company leverages digital marketing and analytics extensively, indicating a growth-oriented approach. The absence of detailed company registration and contact information limits full business intelligence assessment. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content. The company positions itself as a premium yet affordable provider, targeting businesses needing reliable proxy infrastructure for various applications.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates multiple analytics and advertising scripts, which are asynchronously loaded to reduce performance impact. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. There is no visible security or incident response policy, nor contact channels for security issues. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file suggests limited formal security governance. While no explicit vulnerabilities were found in the content, the lack of transparency and security best practices could expose the business to risks. Enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and providing incident response contacts would strengthen the security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance web security.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security-related inquiries.
  4. Establish and publicize an incident response policy and vulnerability disclosure program to demonstrate security maturity.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and SDKs to ensure no vulnerabilities or privacy issues are introduced.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
711Proxy
Description
711Proxy provides rotating and static residential IPs in 200 countries around the world, with an ultra-high utilization rate, stable online, and high degree of privacy, which can meet all the needs of enterprises.
Key services
rotating residential IP proxies, static residential IP proxies, unlimited proxies
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Tailwind CSS, Google Fonts, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager, Twitter Universal Website Tag, Airwallex SDK, Useepay SDK, Salesmartly Chat Widget
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of multiple analytics and tracking scripts with async loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Twitter Universal Website Tag, Bing UET
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads, Twitter Ads, Facebook Ads, Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, Twitter Universal Website Tag, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Marketing tools
Salesmartly Chat Widget
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. No WHOIS data available indicating possible privacy protection or new registration
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is present and active
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers found on the main page
  6. Multiple third-party analytics and advertising scripts used
  7. Website content is focused on proxy services with professional presentation
  8. No security headers detected in provided data
  9. No security or incident response policies visible
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack including Tailwind CSS and Google Fonts for styling, and integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools such as Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager, and Twitter Universal Website Tag. Payment SDKs from Useepay and Airwallex are included, indicating support for online transactions. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts to improve load times. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. The lack of security headers and absence of structured data beyond Open Graph limits technical robustness. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and security configurations to reduce technical debt and enhance user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 711proxy.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 711proxy.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.