Skip to main content

Security report for 4team.biz

4Team Corporation · Technology · United States

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

4Team Corporation is a well-established software company founded in 1999 in the United States, specializing in custom software development, cloud and mobile applications, and Microsoft Outlook add-ins. The company positions itself as a Microsoft Gold Certified Partner, serving both enterprise and individual clients globally. Their business model focuses on product sales, user consulting, and marketing services, supported by a motivated and skilled team. The website reflects a professional and trustworthy brand with strong customer testimonials and trust indicators such as money-back guarantees and SSL certification. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including jQuery, Bootstrap, and slick carousel, integrated with Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for marketing and analytics purposes. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, providing a good user experience. Live chat support is enabled via Tawk.to, enhancing customer engagement. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with a trusted Sectigo SSL certificate, but lacks visible security headers and explicit cookie consent mechanisms. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The absence of WHOIS data reduces transparency and slightly impacts trustworthiness, though the overall security posture is solid. Overall, the website is professional, secure, and compliant with privacy policies, but could improve by adding security headers, cookie consent, and publishing incident response information. The domain's missing WHOIS data is a concern but does not outweigh the positive trust signals present on the site.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: SMB

      Port 445 (SMB) is publicly accessible - SMB - Windows file sharing, high risk

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to SMB using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 4team.biz

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
58
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

4Team Corporation operates in the technology sector with a focus on Microsoft technology-based software solutions. Their market positioning as a Microsoft Gold Partner and their 25+ years of operation provide competitive advantages. The company targets enterprises and individual users needing productivity and email automation tools. Revenue streams include software product sales, consulting, and custom development. The partnership ecosystem includes Microsoft and related custom solution providers. Growth indicators include a global customer base and active marketing efforts. Strategic observations highlight a strong emphasis on customer satisfaction, quality assurance, and continuous product improvement.

Security posture

The security maturity level of 4Team Corporation's website is moderate to high. The use of HTTPS with a Sectigo SSL certificate ensures encrypted communications. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options indicates room for improvement. No exposed credentials or sensitive data were found, and no vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided scripts. Compliance with GDPR is suggested by the presence of a comprehensive privacy policy. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not explicitly documented on the site, which could be enhanced to improve overall security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a clear cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply fully with privacy regulations and improve user transparency.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to demonstrate security maturity and readiness.
  4. Consider creating and publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate risks from vulnerable libraries.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
4Team Corporation
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
4Team Corporation
Description
Custom software development. Cloud and mobile apps. Microsoft Outlook Add-ins. Productivity tools for email automation and business data management.
Key services
Software development, Product sales, User consulting, Marketing
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Slick Carousel, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Tawk.to live chat
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Windows, Cloud, Mobile
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Sectigo SSL certificate
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure live chat integration

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
PPC and SEO tools (implied)
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and rich content
  2. Strong trust signals including Microsoft Gold Partner badge and customer testimonials
  3. Live chat support integrated via Tawk.to
  4. No visible security headers detected in provided data
  5. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces transparency
  6. Privacy and terms pages are present and comprehensive
  7. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected
  8. Multiple external trusted domains linked
  9. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack featuring jQuery, Bootstrap, and slick carousel for UI components and responsiveness. Integration with Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager supports marketing analytics and user behavior tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with fast loading times indicated by moderate performance. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Hosting provider details are not available from the provided data. Technical risks are minimal but include the absence of security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, which are recommended for modernization and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 4team.biz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 4team.biz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.