Skip to main content

Security report for 4grit.com

FOUR GRIT · Technology · South Korea

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FOUR GRIT is a Korean startup based in Pangyo specializing in UX big data analytics solutions, notably through their product Beusable. Founded around 2015, the company has established partnerships with major global corporations such as Samsung Electronics, LG Electronics, and Dentsu, positioning itself as an emerging player in the technology sector focused on data utilization and analysis. Their business model includes providing analytics software, educational seminars, and publishing related content to foster a culture of data-driven decision making. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor and Yoast SEO, with integration of Google Analytics and Adobe Launch for tracking and marketing. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and professionally designed, though it lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which is a compliance gap. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced but missing some security headers and incident response contacts. WHOIS data is unavailable, which raises some concerns about domain registration transparency but does not negate the legitimacy of the business based on website content and partnerships.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 4grit.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets businesses and professionals seeking intuitive data analysis and UX insights. Its competitive advantage lies in its partnerships with industry leaders and its focus on making data analysis accessible and engaging. Revenue streams likely include software licensing, consulting, seminars, and content sales. The partnership ecosystem includes major electronics and advertising firms, indicating strong market validation. Growth indicators include expanded partnerships and increased subscribers to their analytics tools. The company operates primarily in the Korean market with international outreach through partners like Dentsu in Japan.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, uses modern CMS and plugins, and integrates reputable analytics services. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No explicit security or incident response policies or contacts are provided, which is a gap in transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Compliance with GDPR or other privacy regulations is not clearly demonstrated, and cookie consent mechanisms are absent. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for improvement in policy transparency and technical headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance web security.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and designate an incident response contact or team.
  4. Verify and publish domain WHOIS information or ensure domain registration transparency to improve trustworthiness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure minimal privacy impact and compliance with data protection laws.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FOUR GRIT
Description
FOUR GRIT, based in Pangyo, the center of IT in Korea, is a startup founded with the mission of “Build a world where anyone can intuitively read and use data!”. In 2020, five years after starting the business, they partnered with Samsung Electronics, LG Electronics, Dentsu, and other global companies on their UX big data analytics solution Beusable.
Key services
UX big data analytics solution (Beusable), Data analysis seminars, UX insights blog, Books on data analysis
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Adobe Launch
Frameworks
Elementor (WordPress page builder)
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Adobe Launch
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Adobe Launch
Marketing tools
Adobe Launch
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual for an active business website.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the analyzed page.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the page analyzed.
  5. Website uses modern WordPress CMS with Elementor and Yoast SEO plugins.
  6. Multiple trusted partnerships and client logos displayed, enhancing credibility.
  7. Tracking and analytics scripts from Google and Adobe are present.
  8. No security headers detected in the provided data; HTTPS is enforced.
  9. Content is business-focused, targeting data analysis and UX professionals.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern and flexible content management approach. Integration with Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Adobe Launch shows a mature marketing and analytics infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. Accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. The site uses canonical URLs and Open Graph metadata for SEO and social sharing. No hosting provider information was detected. The site could benefit from improved security headers and explicit privacy and cookie policies to align with best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 59/100Medium36 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 4grit.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 4grit.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.