Skip to main content

Security report for 4biz.at

4biz Consulting GmbH · Technology · Austria

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

4biz Consulting GmbH operates as a corporate think tank within the Peter Lieber Unternehmensgruppe, focusing on interdisciplinary research and project groups that support strategic decision-making and innovation. The company collaborates closely with partner firms specializing in enterprise architecture and UML modeling, positioning itself as a niche consulting entity in the technology sector. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear business descriptions and partner references. Technically, the website uses standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and jQuery, with a moderate performance profile and good mobile optimization. However, there is no evidence of a CMS or advanced frameworks, and accessibility features are basic. SEO optimization is minimal but present. From a security perspective, the site lacks visible security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, and no HTTPS status was provided in the data. No forms with sensitive data collection were detected, reducing immediate risk exposure. Privacy policy is present and GDPR compliant, but terms of service and incident response policies are missing. WHOIS data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the website presents a moderate risk profile with room for improvement in security best practices and privacy compliance. Strategic enhancements in HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and cookie consent would strengthen the security posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 4biz.at

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

4biz Consulting GmbH is positioned as an important entity within the technology consulting sector, serving as a corporate think tank for the Peter Lieber Unternehmensgruppe. Its business model revolves around providing strategic consulting, trend analysis, and innovation facilitation to corporate clients and partners. The company leverages a partnership ecosystem including SparxSystems Central Europe, LieberLieber, and Sparx Services Central Europe, which enhances its market positioning in enterprise architecture and UML modeling. The target customers are corporate leadership and interdisciplinary teams seeking future-oriented business insights. The absence of direct sales or e-commerce indicates a B2B consulting focus. Growth indicators are not explicit but the association with established partners suggests stability and niche specialization.

Security posture

The current security posture of the website is moderate but incomplete. The absence of HTTPS confirmation and lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represent gaps that could expose the site to common web vulnerabilities. No forms with sensitive input reduce immediate risk, but the lack of cookie consent and privacy controls could lead to compliance issues under GDPR. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not present, indicating limited readiness for security incidents. The WHOIS data is consistent and transparent, supporting trust. Overall, the site would benefit from implementing standard web security best practices and formalizing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a strong SSL/TLS configuration and ensure all site content is served securely.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common attacks.
  3. Deploy a cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  4. Develop and publish terms of service and incident response policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and search visibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
4biz Consulting GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
4biz Consulting GmbH
Description
4biz Consulting GmbH operates as a Corporate Think Tank within the Peter Lieber Unternehmensgruppe, focusing on interdisciplinary project groups, research coordination, and corporate areas addressing future-oriented questions to support leadership decision-making and company goals through analyses, strategy conception, and innovation.
Key services
Trend and future analyses, Strategy conception, Innovation facilitation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and content is complete
  2. No WAF or security blocking detected
  3. No cookie consent mechanism present
  4. Contact information is provided but no phone number visible
  5. No forms with data collection fields detected except a contact email link
  6. No social media links found
  7. Website uses standard web technologies with jQuery
  8. No explicit security headers or advanced security policies detected
  9. Privacy policy is present and GDPR compliant
  10. Terms of service page not found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript with jQuery libraries. There is no detected CMS or advanced web framework, indicating a lightweight and possibly static site architecture. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness. The site structure is clear and navigation is straightforward. However, the lack of modern frameworks or platforms may limit scalability and advanced functionality. No hosting provider information was detected. Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities exist, especially in security and privacy implementations. The site does not use analytics or tracking services, reducing privacy concerns but also limiting business intelligence capabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 4biz.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 4biz.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.