Skip to main content

Security report for 42urduliz.com

42 Urduliz Bizkaia · Education · Spain

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

42 Urduliz Bizkaia is a free, innovative programming campus based in Spain, offering a peer-to-peer, gamified learning experience supported by Fundación Telefónica and the Diputación Foral de Bizkaia. The website is professionally designed using WordPress and modern web technologies, providing a user-friendly and mobile-optimized experience. Security measures include HTTPS, Google reCAPTCHA, and cookie consent management, though additional security headers could enhance protection. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable anomaly that slightly reduces trust, but the website's association with reputable organizations and comprehensive privacy policies support its legitimacy. Overall, the site effectively serves its educational mission with good technical and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 42urduliz.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the education and technology sectors, targeting individuals over 18 seeking programming skills without prior qualifications. Its non-profit model leverages partnerships with Fundación Telefónica and local government entities, positioning it as a leading innovative campus in the region. The business model emphasizes open access, gamification, and peer learning, differentiating it in the competitive educational landscape. The website reflects strong branding consistency and trust signals, including certifications and social media presence. Growth potential is supported by multiple campus locations and ongoing open enrollment.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR. However, the lack of advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security is a gap. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a security.txt file or explicit incident response contacts limits transparency in vulnerability disclosure. Overall, the site maintains good security hygiene appropriate for its educational function.

Recommendations

  1. Implement additional HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Establish a security.txt file to provide clear vulnerability disclosure and incident response information.
  3. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data anomaly to improve domain trustworthiness and transparency.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
42 Urduliz Bizkaia
Description
42 Urduliz Bizkaia is an innovative and free programming campus offering a revolutionary peer-to-peer, gamified learning methodology. It is supported by Fundación Telefónica and the Diputación Foral de Bizkaia, providing a disruptive training model for digital market demands. The campus is open 24/7 with no professors, focusing on self-managed learning and teamwork.
Key services
Free programming education, Peer-to-peer learning, Gamified training, Open 24/7 campus access, Admission through online test and selection phase
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.7.2, PHP, jQuery, Flickity carousel, Bootstrap 5, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Contact Form 7 plugin, Google Fonts (IBM Plex Sans, Lato)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 implemented on forms
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Crazy Egg
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Tag Manager, Crazy Egg
Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (implied via GTM), Crazy Egg
Marketing tools
Crazy Egg
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with modern plugins and technologies.
  3. Strong focus on education and community-driven learning.
  4. Good privacy and cookie policy implementation with consent management.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in visible content; contact via form and social media.
  6. WHOIS data missing, which is a notable anomaly.
  7. No security.txt or explicit vulnerability disclosure found.
  8. Social media presence on major platforms with official accounts.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.7.2 with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, Flickity carousel, and Google reCAPTCHA v3. It uses Google Fonts for typography and integrates Contact Form 7 for user interactions. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and canonical links. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The site uses external resources from reputable domains and implements cookie consent management with granular user controls. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security headers and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 42urduliz.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 42urduliz.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.