3P Technology is a Denmark-based company specializing in software development for industrial automation systems including DCS, PLC, and SCADA. Established in 2007, the company offers both standard and customized software solutions tailored to process industries, leveraging expertise in Siemens PCS7 and plant engineering tools. Their website reflects a focused business model targeting industrial clients requiring automation and control software solutions. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with common plugins and scripts, hosted on One.com, and demonstrates moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance measures.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
25
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
52
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention 3ptechnology.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for 3ptechnology.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
3P Technology occupies a niche market within industrial automation software development, providing specialized services that include standard software packages and custom engineering solutions. Their partnership with Intland indicates a collaborative ecosystem enhancing their offerings. The company targets process industry clients seeking to improve competitiveness, efficiency, and safety through technology. The business model is service-oriented with a focus on quality and expertise. Growth indicators include active recruitment for PLC and SCADA programmers. The company maintains a consistent brand presence and clear contact information, supporting credibility and client engagement.
Security posture
The website employs HTTPS and domain transfer protection, which are positive security indicators. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No analytics or tracking scripts reduce privacy risks but also limit user behavior insights. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.
Recommendations
Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Develop and publish an incident response policy and vulnerability disclosure process to enhance security transparency and readiness.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
3P Technology
Description
3P Technology provides software development services for DCS, PLC, and SCADA systems, focusing on solutions for process industries. They offer standard and individual software packages, plant engineering, and innovation in PLC-SCADA systems with highly qualified specialists.
Key services
Standard CTS with Siemens PCS7 software, Plant engineering with Comos and PCS7, Software packages for DCS, PLC, and SCADA systems, Custom software development for process industries
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
WordPress 5.5.15, jQuery 1.12.4, bb-plugin, bxSlider, Magnific Popup, Google Fonts
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic
Security
Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enabled
ClientTransferProhibited domain status
Analytics and tracking
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor
Advertising
Transparency
poor
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate
Key observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
Contact information is clearly presented in the footer.
Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and scripts.
No visible security headers or advanced security policies implemented.
No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
Business appears specialized in industrial automation software development.
No social media links or explicit trust badges found.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on WordPress 5.5.15 with jQuery 1.12.4 and several plugins such as bb-plugin, bxSlider, and Magnific Popup. Hosting is provided by One.com, indicated by the nameservers. The site uses Google Fonts and loads resources from trusted external domains. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and basic accessibility features. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags and canonical links present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The site lacks modern security headers and DNSSEC, which are technical risks. Overall, the infrastructure is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with 3ptechnology.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 3ptechnology.com.