Skip to main content

Security report for 25622.com

Education · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.25622.com is an educational platform providing a comprehensive collection of Chinese language compositions and writing resources targeted primarily at primary and secondary school students. It offers categorized content including essays for different school levels, writing guidance, and thematic materials. The site appears to serve a niche market focused on Chinese language education, with a small-scale business model centered on content publishing. Technically, the website is built using basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without modern frameworks or CMS detected. The site structure is clear and content is well organized, but mobile optimization and accessibility are basic. Performance is moderate, and SEO practices are minimal but present. No advanced analytics or tracking technologies were identified. From a security perspective, the site lacks HTTPS, security headers, and privacy or cookie policies, indicating a weak security posture. No contact information or incident response channels are provided, and WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, raising concerns about domain legitimacy. No vulnerabilities or malware were detected in the provided content, but the absence of security best practices is notable. Overall, the site is safe for general audiences and provides valuable educational content, but it requires significant improvements in security, privacy compliance, and domain legitimacy verification to enhance trust and protect users.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 25622.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the Education sector, focusing on Chinese language essay resources for students. Its market position is that of a niche content provider with a specialized audience. The business model is content publishing, likely monetized through advertising or partnerships, though no explicit monetization mechanisms were found. The site links to several related educational and dictionary domains, indicating a partnership ecosystem within the educational content space. Growth indicators and parent or subsidiary relationships are not evident. The platform targets students and educators seeking writing materials and guidance, positioning itself as a helpful resource in the Chinese education market.

Security posture

The current security maturity level of the website is low. The absence of HTTPS and security headers exposes users to risks such as data interception and clickjacking. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. The lack of contact information for security incidents or abuse reports suggests poor incident response readiness. No evidence of vulnerabilities or malware was found, but the site does not follow security best practices. This exposes the business to potential reputational damage and user trust issues. Implementing HTTPS, security headers, privacy policies, and incident response contacts are critical next steps.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure user data and improve trust.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Publish clear contact information including security and abuse contacts to enhance incident response capabilities.
  4. Incorporate security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to mitigate common web attacks.
  5. Verify domain registration details and ensure WHOIS information is accurate and publicly available to improve legitimacy and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
作文大全网www.25622.com提供优秀的小学作文大全、初中作文大全、高中作文大全、中考高考满分作文,写人作文,记事作文,写景作文,抒情作文,想象作文。
Key services
小学作文, 初中作文, 高中作文, 中考作文, 高考作文, 英语作文, 写作指导, 作文素材, 猜谜语, 应用文
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an educational resource focused on Chinese language compositions for primary and secondary students.
  2. No HTTPS or security headers detected in the provided data; security posture is weak.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found.
  5. WHOIS data is missing or domain appears unregistered, which is suspicious.
  6. Site uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with no modern frameworks detected.
  7. External links mostly point to related educational and dictionary sites.
  8. No advertising networks or tracking scripts detected in the provided content.
  9. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  10. Site navigation is clear with categorized content sections.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple technology stack consisting of HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without modern frameworks or CMS platforms. The site structure is straightforward with categorized content sections and internal linking. Performance is moderate, but mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, suggesting room for improvement. SEO is minimally addressed through meta tags but lacks advanced optimization. No advanced analytics or tracking tools were detected, indicating limited data collection. The absence of HTTPS and security headers is a significant technical risk. Overall, the site is functional but outdated and requires modernization to improve security, performance, and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 25622.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 25622.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.