Skip to main content

Security report for ekopufi.1w.lv

1w.lv · Technology · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

35/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

1w.lv is a Latvian-based free website creation and hosting service targeting individuals and small businesses seeking easy-to-use web presence solutions. The platform offers a custom CMS with features such as e-commerce, forums, blogs, and mobile support, funded through advertising. The website content is primarily in Latvian and provides basic information about the service and user login functionality. Technically, the site uses standard HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with Google APIs integration. Security measures include CAPTCHA on login and free SSL/TLS certificates, but lack modern HTTP security headers and privacy policies, indicating room for improvement in compliance and security posture. WHOIS data was unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the site is functional but basic, with moderate trustworthiness and a need for enhanced security and privacy practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ekopufi.1w.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
35

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ekopufi.1w.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
20
Employees
0
Customers
20
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
30%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for ekopufi.1w.lv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the technology sector, focusing on free web hosting and CMS services in Latvia. Its business model relies on advertising revenue, offering free services to users with ads displayed on hosted sites. The target market includes Latvian individuals and small enterprises needing simple web solutions. The company has a modest market position with over 2,200 registered users as per site content. Partnerships with local service providers are evident through advertising links. The lack of detailed company registration or certification information limits deeper business intelligence insights. Growth potential exists if security and compliance are improved to build greater user trust.

Security posture

The security posture is basic with some positive elements such as SSL/TLS usage and CAPTCHA protection on login forms. However, the absence of HTTP security headers like Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and anti-CSRF tokens exposes the site to potential risks. No privacy or cookie policies are published, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not evident. The lack of WHOIS data further complicates trust assessment. Overall, the site demonstrates minimal security maturity and would benefit from implementing standard web security best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance statements and implement a cookie consent mechanism.
  3. Add anti-CSRF tokens to all forms to prevent cross-site request forgery attacks.
  4. Establish and publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure contacts to improve security transparency.
  5. Improve website accessibility and mobile responsiveness to enhance user experience and SEO.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
1w.lv
Description
Bezmaksas satura vadības sistēma un hostings, veidots speciāli lietotāju ērtībai, ar iespējām veidot vizītkarti, portfolio, blogu, ziņu portālu vai internetveikalu. Piedāvā bezmaksas mājas lapu izveidi un uzturēšanu ar reklāmu atbalstu.
Key services
Free website creation, Hosting, Mobile version support, SSL/TLS certificates, E-commerce, Forums, User registration, Article posting, E-forms and mailing lists
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS, JavaScript, Google APIs (Google Plus One script)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of CAPTCHA on login form
  • Free SSL/TLS certificates enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website offers free website creation and hosting services targeted at Latvian users.
  2. Content is in Latvian language with localized keywords and descriptions.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Login form uses CAPTCHA to prevent automated abuse.
  5. No visible security headers detected, which is a security improvement area.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error, limiting domain trust assessment.
  7. External links mostly to related Latvian service providers and Google APIs.
  8. No social media links or phone numbers found.
  9. Website design is basic and somewhat dated but functional.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom CMS platform with standard web technologies (HTML, CSS, JavaScript) and integrates Google APIs for social features. The site design is basic and somewhat dated but functional. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization indicators. Mobile support is present but basic. No modern frameworks or platforms detected. Hosting provider is not identified. The site lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Security technical debt is present due to missing security headers and compliance documentation. Overall, the technical infrastructure is sufficient for basic operations but requires modernization and security enhancements to meet current standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ekopufi.1w.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ekopufi.1w.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.