Skip to main content

Security report for 1password.com

1Password · Technology · Canada

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

1Password is a mature and industry-leading technology company specializing in password management and extended access management solutions for individuals, families, and enterprises. The company offers a comprehensive suite of products including enterprise password management, device trust, and access governance, positioning itself strongly in the cybersecurity market. Their website reflects a professional and well-branded digital presence with clear messaging and extensive resources. Technically, the site leverages modern frameworks like Next.js and React, hosted on Cloudflare and Netlify, ensuring fast performance and good mobile optimization. However, critical security issues exist due to an invalid SSL certificate and lack of modern TLS protocol support, which significantly impact the security posture. Privacy and compliance documentation is comprehensive and GDPR compliant. Overall, 1Password demonstrates strong business credibility and digital maturity but must urgently address SSL and TLS issues to maintain trust and security.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 1password.com

This scan found 15 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
60
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention 1password.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
28,060
Employees
0
Customers
28,020
Third parties
40
Weak passwords
9%

3,102 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for 1password.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

1Password holds a strong market position as a trusted password manager with over 165,000 business customers and millions of families. Their business model is subscription-based SaaS, targeting a broad audience from individuals to large enterprises. The company benefits from strategic partnerships, including with Oracle Red Bull Racing, and maintains a robust ecosystem with developer tools and a marketplace. Recognitions from Wired, Forrester, Gartner, and Trustpilot reinforce their competitive advantage. The company emphasizes security, usability, and compliance, catering to modern security challenges such as passwordless authentication, device security, and SaaS governance. Their growth is supported by a comprehensive product portfolio and active community engagement.

Security posture

The website implements strong security headers and a strict Content Security Policy, enhancing protection against common web attacks. HSTS is enabled with preload and includeSubDomains directives. The presence of a bug bounty program indicates a proactive security culture. However, the invalid SSL certificate and absence of TLS protocol support represent critical vulnerabilities that could expose users to interception and downgrade attacks. The lack of OCSP stapling and session resumption further degrade TLS security and performance. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries was found. Privacy policies and legal documents are well maintained, supporting compliance efforts. Incident response contact details are not explicitly provided, which could be improved.

Recommendations

  1. Immediately renew and correctly configure SSL certificates to enable valid HTTPS with modern TLS versions (1.2 and 1.3).
  2. Enable OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve TLS security and performance.
  3. Publish explicit incident response and security contact information to enhance transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update security headers and CSP to adapt to evolving threats.
  5. Maintain and promote privacy and compliance documentation to reinforce user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern tech stack including Next.js and React, hosted on Cloudflare and Netlify, with assets served via CDNs like transcend-cdn.com and ctfassets.net. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is fast, though no explicit load time metrics were provided. The site integrates analytics (Google Analytics, Datadog) and marketing tools (LiveChat, Drift). The use of feature flags (Unleash) indicates advanced deployment practices. The main technical risk is the invalid SSL configuration, which undermines the otherwise robust infrastructure. The domain is mature and well-registered, supporting the technical credibility of the site.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 1password.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 1password.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.