Skip to main content

Security report for 1clickfactory.com

Companial · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

1ClickFactory, now rebranded as Companial, is a specialized B2B service provider focused on automating Microsoft Dynamics 365 upgrades, deployments, and development projects. The company targets Microsoft Dynamics partners and businesses seeking to scale efficiently with reduced risk. Their key offerings include automated upgrade tools, code transformation services, cloud self-provisioning on Azure, and CSP licensing programs. The website reflects a mature business with a strong market position supported by customer testimonials and industry awards. Technically, the site leverages modern JavaScript frameworks, cloud hosting, and integrates multiple analytics and tracking tools with user consent mechanisms. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement and ISO 27001 certification for their self-provisioning service, though some improvements in security headers and incident response transparency are recommended. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain introduces some uncertainty regarding domain registration legitimacy, likely due to rebranding and domain transition. Overall, the website is professional, content-rich, and compliant with privacy regulations, supporting a medium-sized technology business.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 1clickfactory.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector, specifically within Microsoft Dynamics 365 ecosystem services. Their business model is service-oriented, providing automated upgrade and development solutions to partners and customers. The rebranding to Companial indicates strategic growth and network expansion. Revenue streams likely include subscription licensing, upgrade services, development projects, and cloud provisioning. The target customers are Microsoft Dynamics partners and enterprises using Dynamics 365 products. The presence of awards and certifications enhances competitive advantage and trust. The company maintains a partner ecosystem and offers training and support resources, indicating a comprehensive service approach.

Security posture

Security maturity is moderate to high, with HTTPS enforced and encrypted authentication cookies. The ISO 27001 certification for the self-provisioning service demonstrates commitment to information security management. Cookie consent and privacy policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant. However, the lack of visible HTTP security headers and absence of explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies represent gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the site content. The use of third-party analytics and tracking is transparent and consent-based. Overall, the security posture supports business operations but could benefit from enhanced security controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen security posture.
  2. Publish a clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy, including a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  3. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance website accessibility compliance to improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Clarify domain registration status and update WHOIS information to improve trust and transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Companial
Description
Scope, Upgrade, deploy and develop your customers’ MS Dynamics solutions faster, with less risk, to scale your business more profitably and quickly with our help.
Key services
Automated upgrades for Dynamics NAV/Business Central and AX/Finance and Supply Chain Management, Code transformation and reports transformation, Development services for Dynamics 365 and related platforms, Cloud self-provisioning on Azure, CSP licensing and partner programs
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
AngularJS (ng-app, ng-controller usage), Flickity carousel, Google Fonts (Open Sans), AppInsights (Microsoft Application Insights), Google Analytics, Hotjar
Frameworks
AngularJS
Platforms
Microsoft Azure
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Encrypted cookies for authentication
  • Cookie consent mechanism with granular controls
  • ISO 27001 certification for self-provisioning service

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Application Insights, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Application Insights
Marketing tools
Hotjar, Comm100 chat
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a legacy site announcing rebranding to Companial
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy mechanisms implemented
  3. Multiple customer testimonials and awards displayed
  4. Strong focus on Microsoft Dynamics 365 upgrade and development services
  5. No WHOIS data available for domain, indicating possible domain status issues or privacy
  6. Use of modern analytics and tracking tools with user consent
  7. No visible security headers detected in HTML source
  8. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information found
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses AngularJS framework combined with Flickity for carousels, hosted likely on Microsoft Azure. It integrates Google Fonts, Microsoft Application Insights, Google Analytics, and Hotjar for performance monitoring and user behavior analysis. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. The CMS appears to be Umbraco based on URL patterns and AngularJS usage. Performance is moderate with some room for optimization. The technical stack is modern but could be updated from AngularJS to a more current framework version. The site uses encrypted cookies and secure connections, but lacks some advanced security headers. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 1clickfactory.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 1clickfactory.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.