Skip to main content

Security report for zoomeye.org

Beijing Knownsec Information Technology Co., Ltd · Technology · China

Partial score · DNS & email only

67/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The domain zoomeye.org is registered to Beijing Knownsec Information Technology Co., Ltd, a Chinese security company established in 2013. The website content is currently inaccessible due to anti-bot or WAF mechanisms, presenting only obfuscated JavaScript typical of security challenge pages. No meaningful business descriptions, contact information, or policies are publicly accessible in the provided HTML content. The technical infrastructure appears to be hosted by Alibaba Cloud Computing (Beijing), consistent with the registrant's location. Due to the lack of accessible content, a comprehensive assessment of the website's digital maturity and security posture is not possible. The WHOIS data indicates a legitimate and mature domain registration, but the absence of visible security best practices and compliance documentation is a concern.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zoomeye.org

This scan found 18 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
67

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention zoomeye.org, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
249
Employees
0
Customers
203
Third parties
46
Weak passwords
0%

7 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for zoomeye.org.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Based on WHOIS data, the business behind zoomeye.org is a Chinese cybersecurity company with a medium-sized profile. The domain age and registration details suggest an established presence in the cybersecurity sector. However, the lack of accessible website content limits insights into market positioning, business model, and service offerings. No partner or subsidiary domains were identified. The company likely targets security professionals or enterprises interested in cybersecurity intelligence, but this cannot be confirmed from the current data.

Security posture

The website is protected by a Web Application Firewall or anti-bot mechanism that blocks direct content access, which is a positive security control to prevent automated attacks. However, no security headers, HTTPS status, or security policies are visible in the provided data. The absence of privacy, cookie, or incident response policies indicates gaps in compliance and transparency. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found. Overall, the security posture cannot be fully assessed but appears to rely heavily on perimeter defenses.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish clear privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Provide accessible contact information including security incident response contacts.
  3. Add security headers and ensure HTTPS is properly configured and enforced.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Improve website content accessibility to allow better user and compliance assessments.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. The HTML content is minimal and contains obfuscated JavaScript typical of anti-bot or WAF challenge pages. No meaningful website content is accessible. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Company
Beijing Knownsec Information Technology Co., Ltd
Content quality
poor

Technology

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is inaccessible due to WAF or anti-bot mechanisms.
  2. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies.
  3. No contact information or business descriptions found in HTML content.
  4. WHOIS data indicates a legitimate Chinese security company as registrant.
  5. Minimal technical metadata and no SEO or accessibility features detected.
  6. No analytics or advertising scripts detected in the provided content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website content is minimal and obfuscated, indicating the presence of anti-bot or WAF protections. Hosting is provided by Alibaba Cloud Computing in Beijing, consistent with the registrant's location. No CMS or frameworks are detectable from the provided HTML. The lack of metadata, SEO tags, or structured data suggests a basic or intentionally restricted web presence. Performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility cannot be evaluated due to blocked content. The technical stack appears minimal and focused on security controls rather than user-facing features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zoomeye.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zoomeye.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.