Skip to main content

Security report for zoneedit.com

ZoneEdit · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ZoneEdit is a technology company specializing in DNS hosting, dynamic DNS, domain management, and email forwarding services. Established since 2000, it serves a broad audience including individuals and businesses seeking reliable DNS and domain solutions. The company also offers web hosting through its TheWeb.Zone service. The website is professionally designed, well-structured, and provides clear information about its services, testimonials, and legal policies. However, the absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises questions about domain registration legitimacy, which impacts overall trustworthiness. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using a variety of plugins such as Gravity Forms, Ultimate Member, and Thrive Headline Optimizer. It employs modern web technologies including jQuery and Google Analytics for tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and has good SEO practices, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure, but lacks explicit security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. From a security perspective, the site shows good practices such as login alert notifications and use of security plugins, but could improve by publishing security policies and incident response information. The lack of WHOIS data is a notable concern that should be addressed to enhance domain legitimacy and trust. Overall, ZoneEdit presents as a reliable DNS and domain service provider with a mature digital presence but should improve transparency around domain registration and privacy compliance to strengthen trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zoneedit.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
45
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ZoneEdit occupies a niche in the DNS and domain management market with a long-standing history since 2000. Its competitive advantage lies in offering a comprehensive suite of DNS services including managed DNS, dynamic DNS, email tools, and domain registration consolidated under one platform. The business model is service-oriented with free and paid tiers, targeting IT professionals, small to medium businesses, and domain owners. The presence of testimonials and a dedicated support forum indicates a customer-centric approach. The company leverages partnerships through related domains like its support and forum sites. Growth indicators include the addition of web hosting services and continuous plugin integrations. However, the lack of publicly available WHOIS data may impact customer confidence and should be investigated.

Security posture

ZoneEdit demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with HTTPS enforced site-wide and use of security-related plugins such as Wordfence. Customer testimonials mention login alert notifications, indicating proactive security measures. However, the absence of explicit security headers (e.g., Content Security Policy, HSTS) and lack of published security or incident response policies are gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Incident response contact channels are not publicly available. Overall, the security maturity is adequate but could be enhanced by formalizing policies and improving transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  2. Add explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Introduce a cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations and improve user trust.
  4. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to confirm domain registration legitimacy and improve business credibility.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and broaden user inclusivity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ZoneEdit
Description
Zoneedit is the original DNS provider offering DNS hosting, dynamic DNS, domain management, email tools, and registrar services. They have helped over a million clients since 2000 and provide web hosting through TheWeb.Zone.
Key services
Managed DNS, Email Tools, Domain Registrar, Dynamic DNS, Web Hosting (TheWeb.Zone)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Google Analytics, Gravity Forms, Ultimate Member plugin, Responsive Menu plugin, Popup Maker plugin, Thrive Headline Optimizer
Frameworks
Genesis Framework
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (Wordfence indicated by script)
  • Login alert notification mentioned in testimonial

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Clicky Analytics, MonsterInsights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Clicky Analytics, MonsterInsights
Marketing tools
MonsterInsights, Popup Maker, Thrive Headline Optimizer, Trackcmp
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is focused on DNS and domain management services
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage
  4. Privacy and Terms of Service pages are present and linked
  5. No cookie consent banner detected
  6. Use of multiple analytics and marketing tools
  7. WHOIS data missing or domain not found in public WHOIS database
  8. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins
  9. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content
  10. Testimonials present indicating customer satisfaction
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using a modern tech stack including PHP, jQuery, and various plugins for forms, membership, and analytics. It integrates Google Analytics, Clicky Analytics, and MonsterInsights for user tracking and marketing insights. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses a custom theme based on the Genesis Framework. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and optimized CSS. However, the site lacks some advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. The technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from modernization in security and privacy compliance aspects to reduce technical debt and enhance resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 72/100 +1Medium28 findingsView report
  2. 71/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zoneedit.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zoneedit.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.