Skip to main content

Security report for zonecloud.ee

Zone Media LLC · Technology · Estonia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Network security.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ZoneCloud is a cloud service platform operated by Zone Media LLC, providing file synchronization and webmail services primarily targeting individuals and businesses in Estonia. The company has a mature domain registered since 2013 and presents a consistent brand identity. Technically, the website employs a variety of JavaScript libraries and frameworks indicating moderate digital maturity, but suffers from moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. Security posture is weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate, lack of HTTPS, and missing security headers, exposing users to potential risks. Email security is partially addressed with valid SPF and DMARC records. Privacy compliance is lacking as no privacy or cookie policies are present. Overall, the website is functional but requires significant improvements in security and privacy to meet modern standards.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of zonecloud.ee. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zonecloud.ee

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
80
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
15
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ZoneCloud operates in the technology sector focusing on cloud storage and file synchronization services. The business model likely revolves around subscription-based cloud services. The company targets users needing secure and accessible cloud storage solutions, with a regional focus in Estonia. The domain age and registrant information support a stable market presence. However, the lack of visible trust indicators such as certifications or customer testimonials limits perceived credibility. The absence of contact information and privacy policies may hinder customer trust and regulatory compliance. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website content.

Security posture

The current security posture is weak, primarily due to the lack of HTTPS and a valid SSL certificate, which is a critical vulnerability. The absence of security headers and advanced TLS configurations further reduces security. DNS security features like DNSSEC and CAA are not enabled, increasing risk of DNS spoofing or unauthorized certificate issuance. Email security is partially addressed with SPF and DMARC policies. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, indicating limited readiness for security incidents. The site’s login form collects sensitive credentials but is not protected by HTTPS, posing a significant risk to user data confidentiality.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Enable DNSSEC and CAA records to enhance DNS and certificate issuance security.
  4. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  5. Provide visible contact information including support and security incident contacts.
  6. Implement an incident response policy and publish vulnerability disclosure guidelines.
  7. Optimize website performance and mobile responsiveness to improve user experience.
  8. Consider adding trust indicators such as certifications, testimonials, or security badges.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a mature and diverse JavaScript technology stack including jQuery, Backbone.js, Bootstrap, and others, indicating a moderately complex front-end architecture. The site loads a large number of resources (107) resulting in moderate load times (~3.4 seconds). There is no evidence of a CMS or hosting provider from the data. The absence of HTTPS and modern TLS protocols is a critical technical deficiency. The site is mobile responsive at a basic level and includes accessibility features such as labels and ARIA attributes, but overall SEO and accessibility optimizations are basic. The DNS setup includes valid SPF and DMARC records but lacks DNSSEC and CAA, which are recommended for enhanced security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 55/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zonecloud.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zonecloud.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.