Skip to main content

Security report for zencoder.com

Brightcove, Inc. · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Brightcove, Inc. is a well-established American software company specializing in online video platform services, including the robust video encoding platform Zencoder. The company targets businesses and developers seeking reliable, scalable video encoding and streaming solutions. Brightcove holds a strong market position as a trusted provider of intelligent video engagement technologies, offering a suite of products such as Marketing Studio, Communications Studio, and Media Studio. Their business model is SaaS-based, focusing on enterprise and mid-sized customers globally. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Elementor, enhanced by performance optimizations like NitroPack and multilingual support via Weglot. The infrastructure leverages modern web technologies and integrates major analytics and advertising platforms, ensuring a fast, mobile-optimized, and accessible user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement and secure script usage, though explicit security headers and dedicated security policies are not prominently published. Privacy compliance is well addressed with visible privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the site reflects a professional and credible business presence with strong branding and user engagement features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zencoder.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Brightcove operates in the technology and media sectors, providing video platform and encoding services that cater to retail, financial services, SaaS, and live streaming industries. Their competitive advantage lies in their comprehensive product suite, global reach, and integration capabilities. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees for platform access and professional services. The company maintains a robust partnership ecosystem, including a marketplace for streaming solutions. Growth indicators include continuous product innovation, AI content suite introduction, and extensive resource offerings. Brightcove's operations demonstrate a mature digital presence with strategic marketing and customer engagement initiatives.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. Use of trusted third-party scripts and consent management indicates attention to privacy and security best practices. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and lack of a public security policy or incident response page suggest areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or malicious indicators were detected. Compliance with GDPR is implied through privacy policies and cookie consent. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not publicly evident, which could be enhanced to improve trust and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Create and make accessible a dedicated security policy and incident response page to inform users and partners.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Provide clear contact information for the Data Protection Officer or privacy/security contacts.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
Brightcove, Inc.
VAT number
GB915835410
Registration number
20-1579162
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Brightcove, Inc.
Description
Brightcove, Inc. is an American software company based in Boston, Massachusetts, that produces an online video platform.
Key services
Video encoding (Zencoder), Video platform services, Marketing Studio, Communications Studio, Media Studio, Ad Monetization, Custom Solutions and Workflows
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Bing Ads, Elementor, NitroPack, jQuery, FontAwesome, Weglot (translation), Warmly widget
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
Brightcove Video Platform
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure external scripts
  • Consent management for cookies

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Bing Ads
Marketing tools
Weglot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is comprehensive and targeted at business customers.
  3. Multiple language support via Weglot.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and performance optimizations.
  5. Clear contact information and social media presence.
  6. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  7. No visible security policy or incident response page.
  8. WHOIS data unavailable, possibly due to privacy protection.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder, leveraging performance optimization tools like NitroPack and multilingual support via Weglot. It integrates multiple analytics and advertising platforms including Google Tag Manager and Bing Ads. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly with comprehensive metadata and structured data. The technical infrastructure supports fast loading times and a professional user experience. Opportunities exist to enhance security configurations and formalize security-related documentation. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals effectively with room for incremental improvements in security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zencoder.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zencoder.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.