Skip to main content

Security report for zazzle.com

E-commerce · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website zazzle.com is currently inaccessible due to a PerimeterX Web Application Firewall (WAF) challenge page that blocks content access. This prevents extraction of business, policy, or contact information from the site. The domain is long-established since 1999 and registered via MarkMonitor Inc., a reputable registrar specializing in brand protection, indicating a legitimate and stable business presence. The site appears to be an e-commerce platform, but no direct content or metadata is available for detailed analysis. The technical infrastructure includes PerimeterX for bot mitigation and security. Due to the WAF block, security posture and privacy compliance cannot be fully assessed, and the overall AI score is low, reflecting limited visibility into the site’s actual content and policies.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of zazzle.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zazzle.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Based on WHOIS data and domain age, zazzle.com is a mature e-commerce business likely serving a large customer base. The use of MarkMonitor as registrar and multiple domain status locks suggests strong brand protection and operational maturity. However, no direct business descriptions, contact details, or policy documents were accessible in the provided content. The external domains referenced relate primarily to security and font resources, with no visible marketing or analytics tools in the blocked content. This limits insight into revenue streams, partnerships, or growth indicators.

Security posture

The presence of PerimeterX WAF indicates a proactive security posture against automated threats and bots. However, no security headers or SSL configuration details were available from the blocked content. The domain status flags in WHOIS show strong protection against unauthorized domain changes. No vulnerabilities or incident response contacts were found in the accessible data. Overall, security maturity appears high at the domain registration level but cannot be fully evaluated at the website content level due to access restrictions.

Recommendations

  1. Provide a publicly accessible version or staging environment for security and compliance audits to enable full analysis.
  2. Publish clear privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies accessible without WAF challenges to improve transparency and compliance.
  3. Implement visible contact information and incident response channels on publicly accessible pages to enhance trust and security readiness.
  4. Ensure security headers and SSL configurations are properly implemented and publicly verifiable.
  5. Consider providing a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible security reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

PerimeterX detected. Page content is a PerimeterX bot/challenge captcha blocking access, indicating WAF/security challenge. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Technology

Stack
PerimeterX

Analytics and tracking

Site quality

Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is blocked by PerimeterX WAF challenge page.
  2. No actual business content or policies accessible for analysis.
  3. WHOIS data indicates a long-established domain with strong protection status.
  4. No contact information or policy documents found in the provided HTML.
  5. External resources are limited to fonts.googleapis.com and PerimeterX domains.
  6. No analytics or advertising scripts detected in the blocked content.
  7. No forms or user input fields present in the blocked page.
  8. No social media or contact links found in the blocked content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website employs PerimeterX technology for bot detection and mitigation, indicating advanced security infrastructure. The domain is hosted with MarkMonitor Inc., a known registrar and brand protection service. External resources include Google Fonts and PerimeterX domains. No CMS or other frameworks were detectable in the blocked content. Performance, accessibility, SEO, and mobile optimization cannot be assessed due to content blocking. The site uses multiple domain status locks to prevent unauthorized changes, reflecting strong domain management practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 70/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zazzle.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zazzle.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.