Skip to main content

Security report for url.tw

智邦生活館 · E-commerce · Taiwan

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Email security.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

智邦生活館 operates a mature e-commerce platform under the domain url.tw, offering comprehensive online store creation services primarily targeting Taiwanese small and medium businesses and entrepreneurs. The platform, branded as Jooshop, provides extensive features including product management, payment gateway integration, logistics support, and marketing tools, all accessible via a responsive web design optimized for multiple devices. The business model is SaaS-based, with additional value-added services such as enterprise email and hosting solutions, positioning the company as a significant player in Taiwan's e-commerce technology sector. The website content is professional, well-structured, and supported by 24/7 customer service, enhancing user trust and engagement.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
GDPR outside view
75/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
9of 9

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

The NIS2 figure counts only evidence anyone can see from the internet. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      Tracking cookies set without a consent banner

      Observed on the first page load as a new visitor, before any consent choice; Guard does not click the banner. The site set 5 analytics or marketing cookies: Google Analytics (__utma, __utmc, __utmz, __utmt). No consent banner or consent platform was detected (Guard scans from the EU, so EU-only banners would have been shown).

      What to do: Load analytics and marketing tags only after the visitor opts in, using a consent banner that offers accept and reject with equal prominence.

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      There is no DMARC record at _dmarc.url.tw, so receivers have no instruction for mail that fails SPF and DKIM.

      What to do: Publish a TXT record at _dmarc.url.tw, starting with "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@url.tw" and moving to p=quarantine or p=reject once reports look clean.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching url.tw

This scan found 21 issues across 7 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
98
Security headers
33
Email security
62
DNS health
95
Network security
85
Website hygiene
75
GDPR outside view
75
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
  • Accessibility: Accessibility is a separate readout from security, so it is reported but not scored. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention url.tw, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
5,077
Employees
3
Customers
4,513
Third parties
561
Weak passwords
39%

Latest record dated 2025-08-01 · 580 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for url.tw.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –ndhealth.url.tw2025-08-01
  • –store.ct-optical.url.tw2025-04-16
  • –store.ct-optical.url.tw2025-04-16

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company leverages a partner ecosystem including hosting.url.com.tw and jooshop.url.com.tw to deliver integrated services. Its competitive advantage lies in offering zero transaction fees, multi-layered product and order management, and seamless integration with local payment and logistics providers. The target market includes SMEs and startups seeking easy-to-use, no-code online store solutions. The presence of free trials and extensive marketing support indicates a growth-oriented strategy. The company maintains a consistent brand image and provides transparent contact information, reinforcing credibility. However, the absence of social media links and limited privacy compliance features suggest areas for digital marketing and compliance improvement.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and includes basic security headers such as cache control directives. It offers login IP restriction and login record tracking, indicating attention to access control. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the use of an outdated jQuery version (1.6) poses potential security risks. The lack of advanced security headers like CSP, X-Frame-Options, and security.txt for vulnerability disclosure limits the security maturity. Privacy compliance is basic, with no cookie consent mechanism detected. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be enhanced by adopting modern security best practices and improving privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations and enhance user trust.
  2. Upgrade JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  3. Add comprehensive security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  4. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve security transparency.
  5. Enhance privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR compliance and data retention policies.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
智邦生活館
Description
智邦生活館網路開店：Jooshop雲端商店提供零抽成、免寫程式的全方位網路開店功能，支援商品上架、金流串接、促銷活動設定，並提供RWD響應式網頁設計，適用多裝置瀏覽，並有24小時電話客服。
Key services
網路開店平台, 金流串接服務, 物流串接服務, 企業信箱, 網站代管與架站服務
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.6, Google Analytics, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Platforms
Jooshop雲端商店平台
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Login IP restriction option
  • Login record tracking
  • No visible sensitive data exposure

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel (mentioned in features)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website provides a comprehensive e-commerce platform with extensive features.
  2. Content is primarily in Chinese, targeting Taiwanese market.
  3. Multiple external links to related service domains under url.com.tw subdomains.
  4. No visible security or privacy policy gaps, but cookie consent mechanism is missing.
  5. Use of older jQuery version (1.6) may pose minor security risks.
  6. No visible contact form on main page, but contact info is present in footer.
  7. No social media direct links detected in the provided content.
  8. Website uses Google Analytics for traffic monitoring.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional tech stack with jQuery 1.6, Google Analytics, and standard HTML/CSS. Hosting is provided by a local Taiwanese provider, ensuring regional performance optimization. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and includes SEO-friendly meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, with potential improvements by updating scripts and optimizing assets. Accessibility features are basic, suggesting room for enhancement to meet modern standards. The platform integrates multiple subdomains for specialized services, indicating a modular architecture. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but would benefit from modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with url.tw. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review url.tw.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.