Skip to main content

Security report for tradeindia.com

TradeIndia · E-commerce · India

Low risk. No critical or high findings.

Security score

95/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TradeIndia is a leading Indian B2B marketplace connecting manufacturers, exporters, suppliers, and buyers with a large user base exceeding 10 million registered users. The platform offers a comprehensive suite of services including product listings, trade leads, membership plans, trade shows, and payment solutions, positioning itself as a dominant player in the Indian e-commerce and manufacturing sectors. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies such as Next.js and React, ensuring a responsive and performant user experience across devices. The presence of Google Tag Manager and CookieYes indicates a mature approach to analytics and privacy compliance. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS, employs standard security headers, and implements cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements, reflecting a strong security posture. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-optimized, with clear business credibility and compliance practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
85/ 100 · Low
GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
9of 9

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

The NIS2 figure counts only evidence anyone can see from the internet. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • Medium

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      No Content-Security-Policy is set, so if an attacker manages to inject a script (cross-site scripting), the browser runs it with full access to the page.

      What to do: Start with "Content-Security-Policy: object-src 'none'; base-uri 'self'; frame-ancestors 'self'" and add a script-src that lists your script origins or uses nonces. Test with a Report-Only header first.

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Keep watching tradeindia.com

This scan found 9 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
83
Email security
89
DNS health
95
Network security
100
Website hygiene
95
GDPR outside view
100
Average
95

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
  • Accessibility: Accessibility is a separate readout from security, so it is reported but not scored. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention tradeindia.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
18,653
Employees
335
Customers
18,159
Third parties
159
Weak passwords
13%

Latest record dated 2026-10-26 · 68 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for tradeindia.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –housekeeping.tradeindia.com2026-10-26
  • –webmail.tradeindia.com2026-10-26
  • –cloudstorage.tradeindia.com2026-10-25
  • –housekeeping.tradeindia.com2026-10-25
  • –webmail.tradeindia.com2026-10-08

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

TradeIndia operates a robust B2B marketplace business model focused on the Indian market, targeting manufacturers, exporters, and suppliers seeking to expand their reach. Its competitive advantage lies in its extensive user base, diversified service offerings, and strategic partnerships with domains handling payments, distributors, and business loans. The platform's revenue streams likely include membership fees, advertising, and value-added services. The company maintains a consistent brand presence and leverages social media channels effectively to engage its audience. Growth indicators include active trade shows, AI-powered search features, and integration of financial services, signaling a forward-looking strategy and ecosystem expansion.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive cookie consent with detailed categories, and standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. The presence of a CSRF protection cookie indicates backend security awareness. However, explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent, representing areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Compliance with GDPR is evident through privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security maturity is good but can be enhanced by publishing formal security documentation and incident response procedures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan on the website to enhance transparency and trust.
  2. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  3. Improve accessibility features to meet compliance standards and enhance user experience for all users.
  4. Add a clear and accessible terms of service page to clarify legal terms and user obligations.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TradeIndia
Description
Tradeindia.com is India’s largest B2B marketplace with over 10 million registered users. Best B2B portal for top manufacturers, suppliers, exporters & dealers. Buy or sell with an amazing experience and grow your business globally.
Key services
Product listings, Trade leads, Membership plans, Trade shows and exhibitions, Business loans, Payment services (Ti_Pay), Distributor finding services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Google Tag Manager, CookieYes (cookie consent), Google Analytics
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • CSRF protection cookie (csrftoken)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking pixels
Facebook
Marketing tools
CookieYes
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented with detailed categories.
  3. Privacy policy is present and GDPR compliant.
  4. No explicit terms of service found.
  5. Contact information includes verified email and phone number.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks (Next.js, React).
  7. Strong security posture with HTTPS and security headers.
  8. Active social media presence on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube.
  9. Multiple external partner domains linked for services like payments and distributors.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected; safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack featuring Next.js and React, enabling server-side rendering and improved SEO. Integration with Google Tag Manager and CookieYes reflects advanced analytics and privacy management capabilities. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design elements and includes accessibility considerations, though these could be further improved. Performance is moderate, with efficient use of preloading and deferred scripts. The infrastructure appears robust, but hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical implementation supports a scalable and user-friendly platform with room for optimization in accessibility and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tradeindia.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tradeindia.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.