Skip to main content

Security report for harmome.com

HarmoMe Textile · E-commerce · Latvia

Low risk. No critical or high findings.

Security score

91/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

HarmoMe Textile is an e-commerce business specializing in high-quality linen and cotton textile products featuring Baltic cultural symbols. The website is built on the Shopify platform, leveraging modern e-commerce technologies and integrations such as Judge.me for customer reviews, Klaviyo for email marketing, and Microsoft Clarity for user behavior analytics. The business targets consumers interested in culturally significant textile products, positioning itself in a niche market with a consistent and professional online presence. Technically, the website demonstrates good performance, mobile optimization, and SEO practices, supported by Shopify's robust hosting and security infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and use of hCaptcha for form protection, though explicit privacy and cookie policies are not found, indicating room for compliance improvement. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally maintained, with a moderate to high AI-assessed quality score.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
75/ 100 · Medium
GDPR outside view
86/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
9of 9

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

The NIS2 figure counts only evidence anyone can see from the internet. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Medium

      Session recording or advertising pixel loaded before consent

      Observed on the first page load as a new visitor, before any consent choice; Guard does not click the banner. The page loaded Microsoft Clarity (www.clarity.ms) while the consent banner was still waiting for an answer. Prior consent is required under ePrivacy Art. 5(3): session recording captures clicks, scrolling and form input.

      What to do: Start session recording only after the visitor accepts analytics cookies.

    • Medium

      Trackers still contacted after "Reject all"

      Guard opened the site in a separate, fresh browser profile, refused consent ("Noraidīt" button) as a visitor would, then reloaded the page. No tracking cookies were set, but session recording or an advertising pixel still sent data: Microsoft Clarity (j.clarity.ms). These services receive the visitor's IP address and behaviour despite the refusal.

      What to do: Load these tags only after consent in the consent platform or tag manager, then repeat the check: reject, reload, and confirm they no longer send requests.

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Medium

      DMARC not enforcing

      The DMARC policy is p=none, so mail that fails authentication is still delivered; the record only collects reports.

      What to do: Review the aggregate reports, then move to p=quarantine and finally p=reject.

Keep watching harmome.com

This scan found 13 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
81
Email security
79
DNS health
95
Network security
100
Website hygiene
95
GDPR outside view
86
Average
91

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
  • Accessibility: Accessibility is a separate readout from security, so it is reported but not scored. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention harmome.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for harmome.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the retail e-commerce sector, focusing on textile products with Baltic motifs, appealing to a culturally aware audience. Its business model is direct-to-consumer online sales via Shopify. The presence of customer reviews and marketing tools suggests active engagement with customers and efforts to build brand trust. The product catalog is extensive, indicating a small but specialized business. The lack of explicit contact information and privacy policies suggests potential areas for growth in transparency and compliance. Partnerships with services like Judge.me and Klaviyo enhance customer experience and marketing effectiveness.

Security posture

The website benefits from Shopify's secure hosting environment, including SSL/TLS encryption and standard security headers. Use of hCaptcha indicates proactive measures against automated abuse. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. However, the absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits transparency and preparedness perception. GDPR compliance indicators are minimal, with no visible cookie consent banners or privacy policy links, which could pose compliance risks in the EU market.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Implement a visible cookie consent mechanism for EU visitors to enhance privacy compliance.
  3. Add explicit security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency.
  4. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet modern standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
HarmoMe Textile
Description
Augstas kvalitātes lina un kokvilnas tekstilizstrādājumi ar Baltu spēka zīmēm
Key services
Sale of linen and cotton textile products, Online shopping platform
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Shopify, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Judge.me Reviews, Klaviyo Email Marketing, hCaptcha
Frameworks
Shopify Liquid
Platforms
Shopify
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of hCaptcha for form protection
  • No exposed sensitive data detected
  • Use of security and privacy verification meta tags

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Microsoft Clarity, Shopify Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Klaviyo Email Marketing, Judge.me Reviews
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a Shopify-based e-commerce store selling Baltic-themed textile products
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in the provided content
  3. Uses multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools
  4. Includes customer review integration via Judge.me
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  7. Website is fully accessible without WAF or security blocks
  8. Good SSL and security header implementation via Shopify platform
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Shopify, utilizing its Liquid templating system and CDN hosting. It integrates multiple third-party scripts for analytics, marketing, and customer reviews, including Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Klaviyo, and Judge.me. The site uses modern web fonts and responsive design techniques, ensuring good mobile optimization. Performance is moderate, with deferred script loading and preloading of fonts. No critical technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and SEO further by adding ARIA attributes and structured data markup. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a stable and scalable e-commerce operation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with harmome.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review harmome.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.